Wikisource:Administrators/Archives/Xxagile

2010-02 admin

The following discussion is closed:

Promoted

Xxagile (talk • contribs) • activity • Global

I would like to nominate Xxagile for adminship. Xxagile has been with us for eighteen months, and has built up a significant number of edits through the site within that time, and significantly contributed through the Page: namespace assisting in many general works, and especially enthusiastically with collaborate works like Proofread of the Month. While I would say Xxagile is one of our quieter achievers, they also work on the patrolling and regularly discovers abuse, undoes it and reports it to WS:AN. For their work in reverting edits and blocking abuse, I feel that the granting of administrative tools would be beneficial to the project. FWIW Xxagile seems to have a like for the poetry, and despite that I am still supporting them for adminship <vbg>. billinghurst sDrewth 04:17, 1 February 2010 (UTC)

Acceptance:Thank you for the nomination Billinghurst, I accept. Thanks to all who have voted so far, I appreciate the support. --Xxagile (talk) 15:35, 1 February 2010 (UTC)

• Support as per nom billinghurst sDrewth 04:17, 1 February 2010 (UTC)
• Support per like of poetry (:P) plus a lot of other major pluses - a definite benefit to the project. Ottava Rima (talk) 05:03, 1 February 2010 (UTC)
• Support --Zyephyrus (talk) 08:16, 1 February 2010 (UTC)
• Support --John Vandenberg ^(chat) 14:37, 1 February 2010 (UTC)
• Support, a poetry fan eh? Maybe now someone will get around to adding and populating Author:Vachel Lindsay, which I've been vaguely intending to do for a while, but I've been too busy with Celtic languages. Angr 15:27, 1 February 2010 (UTC)
• Support. Dovi (talk) 18:54, 1 February 2010 (UTC)
• Support, only because I'm a whore and he worked on my Documents from the Den of Espionage file for me :D Sherurcij ^{Collaboration of the Week: Author:Thomas Carlyle.} 18:57, 1 February 2010 (UTC)
• Support, seems like this is your favorite wiki and you have done lots of good work. Jeepday (talk) 00:40, 4 February 2010 (UTC)
• Support I see a lot of great work in the past and even more great work to come in future! Total support. --Mattwj2002 (talk) 06:03, 7 February 2010 (UTC)
• Support; looks good. --Spangineer^wp (háblame) 15:02, 11 February 2010 (UTC)
• Promoted.—Zhaladshar ^(Talk) 02:35, 13 February 2010 (UTC)
• Late support for the record. Moondyne (talk) 04:14, 14 February 2010 (UTC)

2011-03 confirmation

Administrator since February 2010 (see previous discussions), currently active (contributions · logs · count · crossactivity). Xxagile will be reconfirmed automatically unless at least three established users oppose, which will trigger a vote of confidence with decision by simple majority.

• support and hope that studies abate soon — billinghurst sDrewth 03:17, 6 March 2011 (UTC)
• support — emulates WS principles. regular contributions. — George Orwell III (talk) 04:10, 6 March 2011 (UTC)
• support - JamAKiska (talk) 05:47, 6 March 2011 (UTC)
• support Hesperian 11:12, 6 March 2011 (UTC)
• support - Htonl (talk) 20:19, 6 March 2011 (UTC)
• support — --Zyephyrus (talk) 18:51, 8 March 2011 (UTC)
• Support John Vandenberg ^(chat) 06:12, 14 March 2011 (UTC)
• Support.--Jusjih (talk) 01:18, 16 March 2011 (UTC)
• Support --Mattwj2002 (talk) 16:44, 20 March 2011 (UTC)
• Support - AdamBMorgan (talk) 21:03, 20 March 2011 (UTC)
• Support Inductiveload—talk/contribs 00:51, 26 March 2011 (UTC)

confirmed Billinghurst (talk) 09:00, 2 April 2011 (UTC)

2012-04 confirmation

The following discussion is closed:

Not confirmed

Administrator since February 2010 (see previous discussions), currently inactive (contributions · logs · count · crossactivity). Xxagile will be removed automatically unless a simple majority of established users support continued access.

Note: No edits here since 20 July 2011, nor on any Wikimedia Foundation project since 10 October 2011. Hesperian 11:44, 1 April 2012 (UTC)

• Remove — for inactivity. Restoration should not be an issue in case of return. -- George Orwell III (talk) 15:19, 1 April 2012 (UTC)
• Although removal is automatic a simple majority can overcome it, so I am commenting just in case. Concur with GO3, per inactivity policy, although I withhold judgement on any future restoration as I don't believe I'm very familiar with Xxagile.--Doug.^{(talk • contribs)} 15:36, 1 April 2012 (UTC)
• Unbit :-( — billinghurst sDrewth 17:18, 1 April 2012 (UTC)
• Remove --Spangineer (háblame) 19:50, 1 April 2012 (UTC)
• Remove, per George Orwell III. --Zyephyrus (talk) 23:19, 4 April 2012 (UTC)
• Remove tools at this time. Beeswaxcandle (talk) 09:05, 5 April 2012 (UTC)
• Comment—I don't have enough experience 'working' with Xxagile to cast a vote one way or the other. AKA Londonjackbooks 16:09, 9 April 2012 (UTC)

Not confirmed. Removal of access requested[1] and fulfilled.[2] Hesperian 00:21, 1 May 2012 (UTC)