Wisconsin v. Illinois (279 U.S. 821)/Opinion of the Court

From Wikisource
Jump to navigation Jump to search
879144Wisconsin v. Illinois (279 U.S. 821) — Opinion of the Court

United States Supreme Court

279 U.S. 821

Wisconsin  v.  Illinois


and

Messrs. Wm. J. Morgan and Ralph M. Hoyt, both of Milwaukee, Wis., Herman L. Ekern, of Madison, Wis., C. L. Hilton, of St. Paul, Minn., E. C. Turner and C. C. Crabbe, both of Columbus, Ohio, Geo. W. Woodruff, of Philadelphia, Pa., Newton D. Baker, of Cleveland, Ohio, John W. Reynolds, of Madison, Wis., R. T. Jackson, of Mineral Point, Wis., G. A. Youngquist, of St. Paul, Minn., for the State of Wisconsin and others.

Messrs. Edw. J. Brundage, Wm. F. Mulvihill, Morton S.C.ressy, Edmond D. Adcock, Oscar E. Carlstrom, H. A. Brouillet, Jas. Hamilton Lewis, Geo. F. Barrett, and Louis J. Behan, all of Chicago, Ill., J. T. Kenworthy and Cyrus E. Dietz, both of Rock Island, Ill., Hugh S. Johnson, of Springfield, Ill., Maclay Hoyne, of Chicago, Ill., and James M. Beck, of Washington, D. C., for the State of Illinois and others.

Messrs. Wilber M. Brucker, Atty. Gen., A. B. Dougherty, William W. Potter, and Arthur E. Kidder, all of Lansing, Mich., for the State of Michigan.

Messrs. Hamilton Ward, Atty. Gen., of New York City, Albert J. Danaher, Asst. Atty. Gen., of Albany, N. Y., Albert Ottinger, of New York City, R. J. Le Boeuf, Jr., of Albany, N. Y., and Nathan L. Miller, of New York City, for the State of New York.

Messrs. North T. Gentry, of Columbia, Mo., Daniel N. Kirby, of St. Louis, Mo., and Cornelius Lynde, of Chicago, Ill., for intervener State of Missouri.

Mr. F. M. Thompson, of Nashville, Tenn., for intervener State of Tennessee.

Mr. F. E. Daugherty, of Louisville, Ky., for intervener State of Kentucky.

Mr. Percy Saint, of New Orleans, La., for intervener State of Louisiana.

Mr. H. W. Applegate, of Little Rock, Ark., for intervener State of Arkansas.

Mr. Rush H. Knox, of Jackson, Miss., for intervener State of Mississippi.

Motion of the City of Chicago for leave to intervene denied.

Notes

[edit]

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).

Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse