Jump to content

Withnell v. Ruecking Construction Company

From Wikisource


Withnell v. Ruecking Construction Company
by William R. Day
Syllabus
860989Withnell v. Ruecking Construction Company — SyllabusWilliam R. Day
Court Documents

United States Supreme Court

249 U.S. 63

Withnell  v.  Ruecking Construction Company

 Argued: and Submitted Jan. 16, 1919. --- Decided: March 3, 1919

Messrs. E. T. Allen and C. B. Allen, both of St. Louis, Mo., for plaintiff in error.

[Argument of Counsel from page 64-65 intentionally omitted]

Messrs. Frank B. Coleman and George M. Block, both of St. Louis, Mo., for defendant in error.

[Argument of Counsel from pages 65-66 intentionally omitted]

Mr. Justice DAY delivered the opinion of the Court.

Notes

[edit]

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).

Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse