Jump to content

Woodworth v. Insurance Company/Opinion of the Court

From Wikisource
715145Woodworth v. Insurance Company — Opinion of the CourtSamuel Freeman Miller

United States Supreme Court

72 U.S. 87

Woodworth  v.  Insurance Company


The litigation to establish the liability of the Ross was troublesome and expensive to the Corn Exchange Company. Mr. Woodworth did not, in any manner, aid, or offer to aid in it. His interest was against the liability which the company sought to establish; for, if the Ross was declared not liable, he received these proceeds and remnants as mortgagee of that vessel. But, after permitting his own libel to sleep during this struggle, he attempts, when it is over, to revive that libel, and claims to share in the fruits of a victory won without his aid, and against his wishes. The District and Circuit Courts both thought he was not entitled to do this, so long as the Corn Exchange Company remained unpaid. In this view we concur. [1]

Our remarks are meant to apply to the libel filed April 1, 1863. But all that we have said in reference to that libel applies with additional force to the one filed 14th April, 1864, arising from the longer delay in asserting the claim.

DECREES AFFIRMED WITH COSTS.

Notes

[edit]
  1. See The Saracen, 6 Moore P. C. 56; The Clara, 1 Swabey, 1.

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).

Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse