Jump to content

Holding v. Blankenship/Concurrence Harlan

From Wikisource
Court Documents
Case Syllabus
Per Curiam Opinion of the Court
Concurring Opinion
Harlan

United States Supreme Court

387 U.S. 94

Holding  v.  Blankenship


Mr. Justice HARLAN concurs in the denial of certiorari as to Question 2, but would affirm the judgment of the District Court as to Question 1.

Mr. Justice WHITE would note probable jurisdiction and set the case for oral argument.

Notes

[edit]

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).

Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse