Holding v. Blankenship/Opinion of the Court

From Wikisource
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Holding v. Blankenship
Opinion of the Court
930753Holding v. Blankenship — Opinion of the Court
Court Documents
Case Syllabus
Per Curiam Opinion of the Court
Concurring Opinion
Harlan

United States Supreme Court

387 U.S. 94

Holding  v.  Blankenship


Probable jurisdiction noted as to question 1. The judgment of the District Court for the Western District of Oklahoma entered November 4, 1966, is reversed insofar as it adjudged provisions of §§ 1040.1 to 1040.10 of Title 21 of the Oklahoma Statutes to be constitutional. Bantam Books, Inc. v. Sullivan, 372 U.S. 58, 83 S.Ct. 631, 9 L.Ed.2d 584. Treating the nonappealable issue presented by Question 2 as if contained in a petition for a writ of certiorari, the petition is denied. See Mishkin v. State of New York, 383 U.S. 502, 512, 86 S.Ct. 958, 965, 16 L.Ed.2d 56.

Reversed.

Notes

[edit]

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).

Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse