Intelligence and Security Committee China report
_(St_Edwards_Crown).svg) |
 |
Intelligence and Security
Committee of Parliament
China
Chairman:
The Rt Hon. Sir Julian Lewis MP
HC 1605
|
|
Intelligence and Security
Committee of Parliament
China
Chairman:
The Rt Hon. Sir Julian Lewis MP
Presented to Parliament pursuant to sections 2 and 3
of the Justice and Security Act 2013
Ordered by the House of Commons to be printed on
13 July 2023
HC 1605
© Intelligence and Security Committee of Parliament copyright 2023
The material must be acknowledged as Intelligence and Security Committee of Parliament copyright and the document title sepcified. Where third party material has been identified, permission from the respective copyright holder must be sought.
This publication is licensed under the terms of the Open Government Licence v3.0 except where otherwise stated. To view this licence, visit nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/version/3.
Any enquiries regarding this publication should be sent to us via our webform at isc.independent.gov.uk/contact
This publication is also available on our website at: isc.independent.gov.uk
ISBN 978-1-5286-4302
E0293894307/2023
Printed on paper containing 40% recycled fibre content minimum
Printed in the UK by HH Associates Ltd. on behalf of the Controller of His Majesty’s Stationery Office
THE INTELLIGENCE AND SECURITY COMMITTEE OF PARLIAMENT[1]
The Rt Hon. Sir Julian Lewis MP (Chairman)
The Rt Hon. Maria Eagle MP (from 10 February 2022)
The Rt Hon. Sir John Hayes CBE MP
The Rt Hon. Stewart Hosie MP (until 14 December 2022)
The Rt Hon. Dame Diana Johnson DBE MP (until 14 January 2022)
The Rt Hon. Kevan Jones MP
Owen Thompson MP (from 7 February 2023)
The Rt Hon. Mark Pritchard MP (until 22 January 2022)
Colonel The Rt Hon. Bob Stewart DSO MP
The Rt Hon. Theresa Villiers MP
Admiral The Rt Hon. Lord West of Spithead GCB DSC PC
The Rt Hon. Sir Jeremy Wright KC MP (from 9 February 2022)
The Intelligence and Security Committee of Parliament (ISC) is a statutory committee of Parliament that has responsibility for oversight of the UK Intelligence Community. The Committee was originally established by the Intelligence Services Act 1994 and was reformed, and its powers reinforced, by the Justice and Security Act 2013.
The Committee oversees the intelligence and security activities of the Agencies,[2] including the policies, expenditure, administration and operations of MI5 (the Security Service), MI6 (the Secret Intelligence Service or SIS) and GCHQ (the Government Communications Headquarters). The Committee also scrutinises the work of other parts of the Intelligence Community, including the Joint Intelligence Organisation (JIO) and the National Security Secretariat (NSS) in the Cabinet Office; Defence Intelligence (DI) in the Ministry of Defence; and Homeland Security Group[3] in the Home Office.
The Committee consists of nine Members drawn from both Houses of Parliament. Members are appointed by the Houses of Parliament, having been nominated by the Prime Minister in consultation with the Leader of the Opposition. The Chair of the Committee is elected by its Members.
The Members of the Committee are subject to section 1(1)(b) of the Official Secrets Act 1989 and are routinely given access to highly classified material in carrying out their duties. The Committee sets its own agenda and work programme, taking evidence from Government Ministers, the Heads of the intelligence and security Agencies, senior officials, experts and academics as required. Its Inquiries tend to concentrate on current events and issues of concern, and therefore focus on operational[4] and policy matters, while its Annual Reports address administration and finance.
The Reports can contain highly classified material, which would damage the operational capabilities of the intelligence Agencies if it were published. There is therefore a well-established and lengthy process to prepare the Committee’s Reports ready for publication. The Report is checked to ensure that it is factually correct (i.e. that the facts and figures are up to date in what can be a fast-changing environment). The Intelligence Community may then, on behalf of the Prime Minister, request redaction of material in the Report if they consider that its publication would damage their work—for example, by revealing their targets, methods, sources or operational capabilities. The Committee requires the Intelligence Community to demonstrate clearly how publication of the material in question would be damaging, since the Committee aims to ensure that only the minimum of text is redacted from a Report. Where the Committee rejects a request for material to be redacted, if the organisation considers that the material would cause serious damage to national security if published, then the Head of that organisation must appear before the Committee to argue the case. Once these stages have been completed, the Report is sent to the Prime Minister to consider. Under the Justice and Security Act 2013, the Committee can only lay its Reports before Parliament once the Prime Minister has confirmed that there is no material in them which would prejudice the discharge of the functions of the Agencies or—where the Prime Minister considers that there is such material in the Report—once the Prime Minister has consulted the Committee and it has then excluded the relevant material from the Report.
The Committee believes that it is important that Parliament and the public should be able to see where information had to be redacted: redactions are clearly indicated in the Report by ***. This means that the published Report is the same as the classified version sent to the Prime Minister (albeit with redactions).
- ↑ This Inquiry was commenced by the previous Committee, which sat from November 2017 to November 2019, and was completed by the current Committee. The Report is a compilation of the work undertaken by both Committees.
- ↑ Throughout the Report, the term 'Intelligence Community' is used to refer to the seven organisations that the Committee oversees; the term 'Agencies' refers to MI5, SIS and GCHQ as a collective; and the term 'Departments' refers to the intelligence and security parts of the Ministry of Defence, Cabinet Office and the Home Office (DI, JIO, the National Security Adviser (NSA), NSS and Homeland Security Group (HSG)) as a collective, unless specified otherwise.
- ↑ From 1 April 2021, the Home Office moved to a new structure and the work of the Office for Security and Counter-Terrorism (OSCT) is now carried out by Homeland Security Group. Therefore, OSCT is now referred to as Homeland Security Group.
- ↑ The Committee oversees operations subject to the criteria set out in section 2 of the Justice and Security Act 2013.
1 - China's interest in the UK
1 - The Inquiry
1 - The 'whole-of-state' threat
2 - Protecting the UK
3
PART ONE: THREAT AND RESPONSE7 9
CHINA: AIMS AND AMBITIONS11 - What does China want from the UK?
15
WHAT IS CHINA SEEKING IN THE UK?19 - Political influence
19 - Economic advantage
21
THE CHINESE INTELLIGENCE SERVICES25 - Scale
25 - A broad remit
28 - ‘Whole-of-state’ approach
30
ESPIONAGE31 - Gathering human intelligence
31 - Cyber operations
34
INTERFERENCE37 - Government
38 - Interference in elections
42 - Media
43 - The Chinese diaspora in the UK
45 49
HMG'S BALANCING ACT51 - Conflicting priorities
51 - A joined-up approach
52
THE 'STRATEGY': FRAMEWORKS, PLANS AND PILLARS55 - The China Senior Responsible Owner and National Strategy Implementation Group
57 - The China Framework
57 - The Intelligence Outcomes Prioritisation process
63 - The tri-Agency approach
64 - HMG Hostile State Activity Strategy
65
HMG RESOURCING69 - SIS
69 - GCHQ
70 - MI5
70 - JIO
70 - Other organisations
71 - Potential for increase in resourcing
72
DEFENDING THE UK75 - Responsibility
75 - Focus and coverage
76 - Protective role: CPNI and NCSC
77 - A new approach
79 - Challenges in tackling Chinese spying
79 - Challenges in countering Chinese interference operations
81
ON THE 'OFFENSIVE'85 - Allocation of effort
85 - Requirements
86 - Coverage
87 - Effects
87 - Are SIS and GCHQ 'achieving'?
89 - SIS and GCHQ challenges in operating against China
90
WORKING WITH OUR ALLIES95 - Five Eyes
95 - Other partners
96
LEGISLATION97 - The need for new legislation on Hostile State Activity
97
PART TWO: CASE STUDIES101 102
CHINESE INTERFERENCE IN UK ACADEMIA103 - Influence and interference
103 - Economic advantage
109
THE GOVERNMENT RESPONSE115 - Who: Taking responsibility for tackling influence and interference
115 - How: Taking action on influence and interference
116 - What: Understanding the threat from theft and subversion
116 - How: Taking action on economic advantage
117 122
CHINA'S APPROACH TO TECHNOLOGY123 - Why the UK?
125 - What does China target in the UK?
126
METHODOLOGY: OVERT129 - Licensing agreements
129 - Foreign Direct Investment
129 - Inward investment into China
131 - Standards-setting bodies
132
METHODOLOGY: COVERT135 - Human intelligence
135 - Cyber
137
THE UK GOVERNMENT RESPONSE139 - Understanding the task
139 - Foreign investment and national security
141 - Disrupting activity
147 150
CHINESE INTEREST AND INVESTMENTS151 - China's interest in the UK Civil Nuclear sector
152 - Chinese investments
153 - Linked investments
155
ESPIONAGE AND INFLUENCE159 - Espionage: Incentive and opportunity
159 - Influence: Leverage and disruption
163 - The position of the United States
165
THE GOVERNMENT RESPONSE171 - Cross-government scrutiny of foreign investment
172 - Regulation
174 - Intervention: The 'special share'
175 - Advice to Industry
177 - Wider UK Intelligence Community efforts
180 181 - Investigation of origin
182 - China's initial response
184 - Disinformation
186 - Vaccine development and medical espionage
187 - Debt leverage
189 - Capitalising on the pandemic
190 - Impact on the UK Intelligence Community
190 193 205 207 - Officials
207 - External Expert witnesses
207
This work is licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0 (OGL v.3).
- You are free to:
- copy, publish, distribute and transmit the Information;
- adapt the Information;
- exploit the Information commercially and non-commercially for example, by combining it with other Information, or by including it in your own product or application.
- You must, where you do any of the above:
- acknowledge the source of the Information in your product or application by including or linking to any attribution statement specified by the Information Provider(s) and, where possible, provide a link to this licence;
- If the Information Provider does not provide a specific attribution statement, you must use the following:
- Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse