A I don't believe so, but I can't confirm. I don't have the number saved, so—
Q Right. Okay. Thank you.
Yeah, just one question. I know that we received all these documents in a production from your firm, Mr. Brothers, but I don't believe we received a privilege log. Can you explain for us the basis for redactions on this document?
Mr. Brothers. Yeah. So the redactions are the First Amendment privilege we asserted in our letter that covers voters and campaign volunteers. But, I should say, that's not only a First Amendment privilege objection but also a legislative purpose and pertinence objection is the basis for that redaction.
Thank you for that response.
Setting that aside, it seems that the information that you redacted here might also be described as redacted for personal, identifying, or private information. Is that an accurate assumption on my part?
Mr. Brothers. That's accurate.
Okay. All right. Let's leave it there, and then we can move on.
Great.
- BY
Q Earlier, you had mentioned you'd done some work in Georgia—is that right?—in connection with the 2020 election? Or with just the recount—or just the—excuse me—the runoff elections in Georgia?
A I performed work with both, both the runoff and the general Presidential election.
Sorry. Let me be more clear. I performed work for the National Republican Senatorial Committee for solely the Senate runoff. Did not do anything for the Senate general.
