This page has been validated.
xiv
ARGUMENT OF DRAMA.
PAGE
Scene II.
[Minos and Euclid.]
§ I. A priori reasons for retaining Euclid's Manual.
We require, in a Manual, a selection rather than a complete repertory of Geometrical truths . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
6 |
Discussion limited to subject-matter of Euc. I, II.
....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
|
8 |
One fixed logical sequence essential
....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
|
8„ |
One system of numbering desirable
....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
|
10 |
A priori claims of Euclid's sequence and numeration to be retained
....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
|
11 |
New Theorems might be interpolated without change of numeration
....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
|
11„ |
§ 2. Method of procedure in examining Modern Rivals.
Proposed changes which, even if proved to be essential, would not necessitate the abandonment of Euclid's Manual:—
....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
|
13 |
(1) |
Propositions to be omitted;
|
(2) |
Propositions„ to be replaced by new proofs;
|
(3) |
New Propositions to be added.
|
Proposed changes which, if proved to be essential, would necessitate such abandonment:— . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
15 |
(1) |
Separation of Problems and Theorems;
|
(2) |
Different treatment of Parallels.
|