Page:Creation by Evolution (1928).djvu/314

From Wikisource
Jump to navigation Jump to search
This page has been proofread, but needs to be validated.

CREATION BY EVOLUTION

mony is false? Must we not admit that the scientific research of to-day, no matter how much its results have disturbed mediaeval prejudices, has led us and is still leading us to a more reasonable conception of the order of Nature and of the true mode of creation?


SELECTED REFERENCES

  • Lancaster, E. Ray. Extinct Animals. London, 1905.
  • Marsh, Othniel Charles. Odontornithes: A Monograph of the Extinct Toothed Birds of North America. Washington, 1880.
  • Osborn, Henry Fairfield. The Age of Mammals in Europe, Asia, and North America. New York, 1910.
  • Seeley, H. J. Dragons of the Air, an Account of Extinct Flying Reptiles. London, 1901.

“The whole architecture of a bird skeleton, indeed the whole internal anatomy, is unquestionably a modification of a primitive reptilian type.”—William King Gregory.


“If we admit that species have changed, and are changing at the present time, that is all the principle of evolution implies. The evolutionist stands for and believes in a changing world, and unless you, the reader, believe in a fixed, unchanging world, you, too, are an evolutionist. Evolution is merely the philosophy of change as opposed to the philosophy of fixity and unchangeability.”—H. H. Newman.

[ 254 ]