coFrr?TL (or determinin? all ?? ? ?e tem? ?wer of the ? ? I? ? ?e ?unc? of ?nt ? i? � (?) ?e? ? ?? ? ? ????pt?1?,149 ?e ?' m 1? [VII. I?? o? ? C? 1. N? h tb chu?h ?ve 149 fias 138, 189 HI. Ol?,dons of Ronum (I?holic? as ? ?T ? ?x?B? of i?f? 139 ?g i? ? ? e?ut 1? t ??o? 189 ?t?nU of ? Jm 1?, 1? Pighius cited 140 Maguire 140 Opfniou? of the French 140-142 Of the Huntitian Jesuits 142 Of Milner 14?, 143
- a. Four sysmua ? the aeat of
infallibility, contsmn? twelve Clecl 148 IV. Infallibili? of t? ? !40 1. Popes have contradicted pop? 144 9. Some hsve b?n horzti? Vigilius 144 Liborius 144 Honoriu? 144. 14�ome were guilty of aimoay 14? ?. Some were unskilled in divinity 14? & There were ?nti-popes 14? 5. Some were greedy immoral 146 $. The subject is involved in perplex- i?, on eccouut of the e6j?, of in- falh?!ity 14? 146 �It is disputed what b council 146 9. Councils have deemed councils 146, 147 Tim Council of Nice, in OS0, and Trent, ou adding ufl, m*tidff 146 The 0ouncil of Lecdieea, in or 370, ? Trout, respect- in? the camm of Soripturo 148 Cmatantinople, in 754, the eecoud Couneil of N'?e, on Thenn?�uncil of Nice, sixth 146 147 147 c?on, aspire esvord ochers, VI. I?f? of , pop? dad ?m? 1. Two Miiblee cromer make m in- ffllible 147 The Councils of Conatmc? zad toran 147 2. Nor in the Church of Rom?, as ehe teaches falsa doctrin? 149 3. It ?l involved in perplexity 149, 150 4. Infallibility of the ?t rule 150 VIII. Argumeats ?ai?t 'm/allibil? 150 1. Its title, at lent, is doubtful 150 2. Tbe prinu'tive churches did not pretend t?o it 161 9. By it men are prevenl? f?om exo ercbing their r?fon 151 4. It depends on a false theory 151-150 5. It produces error and sin 158) 154 6. It ? to &ccomplish what it pro- po0es 154 It does not decide cmtroversi? 154 Nor explain Scripture than 7. It presents 8Teeter d?rMultiec the Protestant plan 16?-1157 8. Their plan would require all men to be in?lh?)!e 1157, 158 9. It shuto the door a?inat fion 150, 169 CHAPTER V. THI &NCIINT IPATIfu!S----THIII THOai?Y IN THe CHUIOH or' ROuts 169 1. Some of' them have been cor- ?l,?,d b? the intermi-ture of hero- t?co 159, 160 2. Words and philco have been?l- tered 160 8. ? Church of Rome, by her ex- thel ea?mmtory indic? has corrupted 160-169 4? Some of the fatheru have taught false doctrines 16?B 5. The Council of T?eut decrued n?ny things contrary to the deci- oions of the fathers 169, 168 6. They coutr? etch other in many thingo 168 7. Their cheruc_tor u interpreters 168, 164 8. Opinions of Roman Catholics, re- .?ect?g the authority of the fe- mer? 164, l? 10. U,es of their to?nouy 16? IM ?Sl Rol?W O?VHOLiO ,wD PIOT10T- XllT IULll 00111*AllD 1
�
