Page:History of Public School Education in Arizona.djvu/102

ents were excused from visiting schools when a supervising principal was employed.^[1]

This proposal failed, however, to become a law, and in its stead there was passed in 1912 a law which separated the office in all counties and fixed a schedule of pay for the school superintendents. The 14 counties of the State were divided into 14 classes and payment allowed the county school superintendents as follows:^[2]

Salaries of county superintendents.

Class.	Counties.	Population.	Pay.	Extra allowance for traveling expenses.
1	Maricopa	35,000 and over	$2,400	[Table 1]
2	Cochise	25,000 to 35,000	2,400	$250
3	Pima	20,000 to 25,000	1,500	[Table 2]
4	Yavapai	16,000 to 20,000	2,000	250
5	Greenlee	15,000 to 16,000	1,800	[Table 3]
6	Gila	10,000 to 15,000	2,000	300
7	Graham	8,000 to 10,000	1,200	150
8	Yuma	7,500 to 8,000	1,800	[Table 2]
9	Santa Cruz	7,000 to 7,500	600	250
10	Pinal	6,500 to 7,000	1,500	250
11	Navajo	6,000 to 6,500	1,400	[Table 2]
12	Coconino	5,500 to 6,000	1,500	[Table 2]
13	Mohave	4,000 to 5,500	900	250
14	Apache	Less than 4,000	1,000	250

1. Actual traveling expenses and clerk also allowed at $100 per month.
2. Actual traveling expenses.
3. Actual traveling expenses, and deputy allowed at $75 per month only while superintendent is away visiting schools.

II. ARIZONA TEACHERS’ ASSOCIATION.

The Arizona Teachers’ Association, dates from December 23, 1892. It was first organized at Phoenix during the administration of Supt. Netherton, and because of lack of members usually met with one of the county institutes, as their objects were substantially similar. This continued until 1910, when it held its nineteenth annual meeting jointly with the county institute at Douglas. It was estimated that 300 teachers were in attendance at that session, and an interesting program was offered. The principal teachers were from other States, and presented educational doctrines that were “practical, interesting, and suited to the needs of the teachers,” or were “wholesome, uplifting, and instructive.” But one paper, entitled “Attic Treasures,” served to enliven the meeting. This was a caustic criticism of the schools and their present-day methods, a spectacular and impassioned plea against the “more tawdry and showy gargoyles of modern schoolroom practice.” It was not pleasing to the leaders. An editorial in the Arizona Journal of Education serves to illustrate the attitude of the various types of teachers. This was the last meeting in which the teachers’ association and the county institutes met in joint session.

---

1. Arizona Journal of Education, April, 1910, p. 31.
2. Sess. acts, 1912, ch. 93.