rior walls. 3. So alſo on pavements of brick or
ſtone. 4. It is more copious in proportion as the
walls are thicker; the reverſe of which ought to
be the caſe, if this hypotheſis were juſt. If cold
water be poured into a veſſel of ſtone, or glaſs, a
dew forms inſtantly on the outſide: but if it be
poured into a veſſel of wood, there is no ſuch
appearance. It is not ſuppoſed, in the firſt caſe,
that the water has exuded through the glaſs, but
that it is precipitated from the circumambient air;
as the humid particles of vapor, paſſing from the
boiler of an alembic through its refrigerant, are
precipitated from the air, in which they were
ſuſpended, on the internal ſurface of the refringerant.
Walls of brick or ſtone act as the refrigerant in this
inſtance. They are ſufficiently cold to condenſe
and precipitate the moiſture ſuſpended in the air
of the room, when it is heavily charged therewith.
But walls of wood are not ſo. The queſtion then
is, whether air in which this moiſture is left floating,
or that which is deprived of it, be moſt wholeſome?
In both caſes the remedy is eaſy. A little
fire kindled in the room, whenever the air is damp,
prevents the precipitation on the walls: and this
practice, found healthy in the warmeſt as well as
coldeſt ſeaſons, is as neceſſary in a wooden as in a
ſtone or a brick houſe. I do not mean to ſay,
that the rain never penetrates through walls of
brick. On the contrary I have ſeen inſtances of
it. But with us it is only through the northern
and eaſtern walls of the houſe, after a north-eaſterly
ſtorm. Therſe being the only ones which
continue long enough to force through the walls.
This however happens too rarely to give a juſt
character of unwholeſomeneſs to ſuch houſes. In
Page:Notes on the State of Virginia (1802).djvu/226
Appearance
212
NOTES ON VIRGINIA.