34 § 46-47. conquers a kingdom); as well for (he teaches his pupil) as (he teaches the law). By combining both constructions we obtain 1. at afm rav4; 2. ný fráú aufà; 3. fànci vingamia. This double object may attend a.) verbs of spea- king, as etc., asking, as of af, and sim., teaching, especially Mit and , b.) some others, especially STAA (to win), GIF (to milk), GUYA (to punish, to fine). See P. 1, 4, 51 with the commentaries. aktail and andere ad Examples: speaking: Nala 1,20 R. 2, 52, 31 asking, begging: Ch. Up. 5, 3,5 Tsary: ventaura (that fellow of a rájanya asked me five questions), M. 8, 87, Kathâs. 1, 31 an (he requested a boon of me), Mhbh. 1, 56, 24 your mat quite (I do not beg gold of you, my king, uor silver, nor cows); teaching R. 2, 39, 27 - f atestat azganted (I will do all that, which Mylady enjoins me to do); f: Mhbh. 3, 59, 5 Fourfuta fara
- Kumar. 1, 2 af tota
ked from the earth resplendent gems and herbs of great medi- cinal power); M. 3, 234 rua (he should punish them with a fine of a thousand paņa). Rem. Indian grammar adds to them some others, instances of which construed with a double object are scarcely met with in literature, if at all. Of the kind are a (to gather), (to check), (to rob), (to churn), thus exemplified; affà nou Mamut as I qui aìyfafú zgılà etc, ¹). TA 47. Yet, with none of the said verbs the double accusative is of necessity. Other constructions are quite as usual, sometimes even preferable, especially in simple prose. L $ 3 1 44 (they mil- B 1) Here also vernacular grammarians put the two accus., depending on such verbs, as . , see 40 R. 1 1
