Jump to content

Page:State Documents on Federal Relations.djvu/41

From Wikisource
This page has been proofread, but needs to be validated.
MASSACHUSETTS ON THE EMBARGO
27

executive office, owing to the death of the Governor. In his "Speech" to the legislature, he deprecated the agitation against the laws of the land, condemned the action of the town meetings as seditious and uncalled for, and suggested further restraints upon the licentiousness of the press as desirable. (Resolves of Mass., 1809, 221–229.) Both branches of the legislature "answered" with spirit, as the extracts given below show. They also adopted a Report and Resolutions on the petitions of the town-meetings, extracts from which follow; dispatched a Memorial and Remonstrance to Congress (Amer. State Papers, Commerce, etc., I, 776–778) issued an Address to the People of the Commonwealth, suggesting as "indispensable amendments" to the Federal Constitution, one abolishing the three-fifths representation for slaves,[1] and another "to secure commerce and navigation from a repetition of destructive and insidious theories," and declaring that "nothing less than a perfect union and intelligence among the Eastern States can preserve to them any share of influence in the national government" (Patriotic Proceedings, 126–130; Hildreth, VI, 151–154); denounced the acts of the Lieutenant-Governor in detaching State militia to aid in carrying out the Enforcement Act "as irregular, illegal and inconsistent with the principles of the constitution;" passed a bill "against unreasonable, arbitrary and unconstitutional searches," which was intended to prevent the execution of the Enforcement Act, but which was vetoed by the Governor; and finally, set apart a "Day of Humiliation and Prayer."

The threatening attitude of Massachusetts and several of the other New England States led the federal administration to consent to the repeal of the Embargo, and the substitution of a non-intercourse act. (March 1, 1809, U. S. Stat. at Large, II, 528533.) The recent experience of the State led Governor Gore to suggest, and the Legislature to propose, June 20, 1809, an amendment to the Constitution, placing a limit on the duration of an embargo to "thirty days from the commencement of the session of Congress next succeeding that session in which said law shall have been enacted." (Resolves of Mass., 1809, 312, 313, 356, 357.) This recommendation appears to have received only the approval of Connecticut, but was disapproved of by the legislatures of at least eight States. (Ames, Proposed Amendments, 264, 329.)

References: In addition to the above, the texts of the important measures are given in The Patriotick Proceeding of the Legislature of Massachusetts, [Boston, 1809]; several are found in The American Register, 1809, Part II, 183–209 [Phila., 1809]; The Memorial to Congress is also given in Amer. State Papers, Commerce, etc., I, 776–778; Annals of Congress, 10 Cong., 2 Sess., 444–450; for debate on same and refusal to print in House of Rep., Annals, 538, 539; for history, see Adams, United States, IV, esp. 398–453; Hildreth, VI, esp. 75–79, 108–117, 151–154; McMaster, III, esp. 321–331; Barry, Massachusetts, III, 352–364; Adams, New Eng. Federalism, esp.

  1. Such an amendment had been proposed by the Legislature in 1804 as a protest against the annexation of Louisiana; for this, and the replies of the other States, see McMaster, III, 44–47; Ames, Proposed Amendments, 45, 46, 326.