fl-AO Journal of Philolofjf/. dXX' epn is oikovs' *a yap cuS' ea) bopoyv bpuxu Trep&artv, at narpos Koip.wp.evov aaipovat bcopxt. For at irarpos Kotpaplvov the MSS. have AIIIATPOCIOIAQPIMOI. Why not at narpnov dptpot 'Saipovo'i 8a>pa ? Eurip. Phaethon. fr. 15 (775). dXX* eatff is olkov, pr tiv v H(paioTos -^okov bopovs C7rtcr</)pety peXadpa avp(pXe^ij irvp iv rolcriv T}bLoroio~i <&aedovTos ydpots. rjditrroun is Bekker's restoration of the MSS. IIAICIOICIN. h rola-i 7rrja-ioiari or iv rolatv (rotarib' ?) aicrtotcrt might be suggested perhaps with more plausibility. Eurip. Philoctetes. fr. 11 (789). Ae^o) 5' iy<o, kclv pov bta((>6eipas boKrj Xoyovs, VTTOOTas avros TjbtKrjKfvai' aXX' i ipov yap rdpa padqcrr) kXvcov 6 8' avros avrbv ip(paviet aoi Xiy<ov. paOrjo-rj has been variously corrected, Grotius proposing av paQt](Tji, Musgrave (ppao-0rj<rr Matthise aKOvo-crat or yvao-tTai, Pflugk imo-rrjo-ei, Hartung vvv yvao-jj, Meineke navr to77. Possibly pavTtvaa would be more probable than any of these, " thou shalt divine my actions by hearing of them from myself." Comp. Soph. Antlg. 631. rdx elo-opco-da pavrecov VTTfprepov. In V. 4, ip<j>avi(i aoi, Heath's reading for ipcpavtet aoi, is open to question. Boissonade's ip<pavTj Brja-ei, has great plausibility: but the word may have been ip<pavt(ira>. Eurip. inc. fr. 17 (852). bvarrjvos, Sorts kuI Ta KaXa jsevbr) Xeywv ov rolabe xprjrai rols KaXols dXrjdtatv. Porson corrected ra KaXd ko. KaXtjOionv. Four MSS. however give instead of the whole couplet, the words # nov xXro"i> ion to yjrtvbfj Xeytiv, from which we may conjecture Sorts to. ^oXena f/(vbij Xiycov. Eur. inc. fr. 60 (894). a. ri brjra overt 8ft at KarQavovpevov ; /3. apavov ovbus tedparos ev aifictv deovs. Cobet has corrected ovot into dvav : but would not dvoat be nearer the text?
