378 INDEX. perishing fast from cold and wai fond, ih. — their means of land-trans- port c the food of the French army, ib. — the advantages the French derived from their numerical i — difficult ie in;; fair comparison between the I ■ ii and t lie English, 1.00 — the French medical statistics, ib. — their defective state, 157 — the information, however incomplete, which I statistics convey, ib. — maladies re- cording the hardships endured by the I rench soldiers, 160 — frost-bit' Bcurvy, ib. — the sufferings of the French troi | meas- ure by administrative failure, 161 — extent to which their sufferings and losses became masked from observers, 162 — the transport of the French sick and wounded by sea, 163 — good state, at first, of the French hospitals on the Bo phorus, ib. — the sufferings of the English army, 164 — grievous ex- cess of work that perforce was ini- I ted upon them, ib. — the failure of the land-transport power, 165 — its elfect in addin to the labours of our men, ib.— effect of the hurricane upon Ian of having reserves of food iciencies in the issue of supplies, ib. — the sailors camped on the Chersonese, 168— defective i'!i"' ery, and its effect on the health of the men, 169 -impossibility of hauling up the timber for huts, ib. — the warm clothing, 170 — carcases of horses left above ground for want of hands to bury them, 172— the limit reached by Lord !: acting work from his troops, 173— sufferings
- ed by our troops, 174 — sickness
of our army, 176 — the fortitude of our army, 1S1 — Lord Raglan at this ■ints under i our army v. , 1S6 — remo I . ib. — their suffer- ansports, £6. — our hospil Is in the Levant, 187 — mortality in the hospitals i Bosphorus, 189—1 i I I took place in our hospitals, i'>. — compari- son impracticable between bin of the winter on the French i the English army, £&. — reca] tion, 190- tl ic decisions which resulted in obliging the Allies to winter on the CI esi 1 1 193- - Ulied army, 195- i which it re- sorted, 196 — Canrobert'a mi showing a go,,. i countenance I • Raglan's, ib. — , 19S — ol Lord ! ' iglan's corre- ' [once with the Home Govern- ment, 109 -effect of the noon the Duke ol nieetii! arnment of Parlia- ment, 201 — the nation steadfast, 202 — Impulse given to recrui ants ot Inkerman, ib. — act the press upon the conduct of war, The relations between the Duke of ,ud Lord Raglan from February 1S54 down to nearly the close of the year, '254 — the approach- ing change, 258— unofficial accounts , ib. their i upon the- Duke of Newcastle, ib. — of the public anger upon the nota- tions disposing him to throw blame on Lord Raglan and the Headquarter Staff, ib. — his colleagues assenting, 265— grounds on which the Govern- ment might have : '-d to give Lord Raglan a loyal support, ib. — the need of finding som one to blame, 267 — the process by which Ministers brought their minds to the notion of casting off the blame from ii on Lord Raglan's Staff officers, ib. — the course of action attempted by thi Government, 270 — their fanciful plan, ib. — the Duke of Newc executing his plan of attack, 272 — the feeling of Lord Raglan upon finding himself and his Staff a by the Queen's Government, 274 — his answers to the Duke of New- castle, 275— Ministers balked in their endeavour to sacrifice Lord Raglan's Stall officers, 279 — and thro blame on Lord Raglan himself — yet not meditating his recall, ib. — their reason for not recalling him, ib. — question why this was not a reason for giving him a loyal support, ib. Mot ion in House of Connie Committee of Enquiry, 2S1 — re i Ion of Lord A.berdeen'8 < lovei ament, ib. — formation of Lord Pabnerston's <;,,•. ei times I i i di placed lb. — Lord Aberdeen, ib. — the Duke of Newc import of the change of Ministry, 2si — the war measures of the new Gov- ernment, ib. — continued anger i 8 - tear that they might usurp a control over the military ion how the new union! should satisfy the pub- lic anger, ib. — their determine ib. — Lord Panmure, 2SS— he is well provided with means for informing himself upon the business of the patch of the [dressing outrageous words to Lord Raglan, 294— can it
