interfere by injunction where the complainant h? no cl?ar levi ri?t ? Co., 317. ?e? a ?mt?n ? ? t? ?me name ? t?t of ? o?er ?tion t? f?t t?t it ? a ?r q?ty of ? ?t?r ? not j?t?y t? ? ? ?e?g ?th a s?c? o?er of t? P? ? ?t ?mct?g t? delive? of ?t? not .?d? by st?t n?r M ? wit? Par. 4 of ? ?5 of the General ?tions of 1? m t? ?e ?t ?pt?g t? ? ? ? p? of ?d? ' lb. 3. I? ?h ? off?s. ? the ? ?nnot ?ntml the exe?i? of the d?mti? of ? e?ti? offi?r, ? ?j?ct?on pmvent?g such offi?r from ?fo?g stitution? s?tu? ? not ? ?rfe? with ? ?c?tlon. Y?, 1?. 4. R? o[ r? ? ? ? ?. ? ?il? ? of th? ?t? am of ?t ?itude, ?d the t?u- ?& of ?ns ?te?t? the? a? ?titl? ? pink,ion from the ? ?d f?m t? ?u? ?ually with the o?e? of all other k? of pm?y, ?d the ?u? ?g ju?iction, whether Fede? or should at all times ? o?n ? them, and where them ? no remedy at ?w the pm?r ?u? ? pmte?t their righ? ?uity ? wMch all M?d pa?i? am ?de defendant. 5. E? o[ ? of C? ol Mag l, l? ? ? ? ol P? ? a? thdr ? ?blM?g a civil ?vemm?t for Po? Ri? ?n? by ? 33 of t? ?t of ?y 1, 1?, ? ?puM? ? for 1?1 ?st?tutio? ?d p? the local ?u? and m?i? their julietion over l?l ?aim, ?clud?g ?t?m of pmba? ju?iction. ? v. de R?, ? ?m?, 5; J?gs?o?; ?URT HOUSe. CRIMINAL LAW. Even if the bu?en of p?f ? on the Government ? prove the fact of the p?ner's ?nity, until evidence is given on the other tide, the bu?en ?tisfied by the p?sumption arising f?m the fact t?t most ?ne, and the t?al jud? is not ?und ? ? fu?her th? to inst?c? the ju? that the Goven?men$ ?s ?und ? prove the fact ?yond wa?n?hle doubt. and theft the j? ?ns?der a?] the e?den? including the ?n?ng of the pri?ner, and the manner of Ms o? ?timony. ? v. ?es, 36.
�
