INDEX. 2. Trial; ar?sw?t o! amn*d. An interruption of the court a?dng def?da?t?s cottasol to maim �proper argument held in this oa? to be ju?tifi? and not a ground for tion. lb. 3. A man may sometimes be p,mi?d i? per?m whe? he h? brought quaess to p?ss, although he w? not t?era in per?m. (Ia r? 1? U. 8. ?7.) U?d 8? v. iVla?', ?9. 16, 1883. A solicitation for funds for ?mpai?n purl? made by litter in violation of [ 15 of the Civil Servic? Act o! Janaary 16, 1883, c. 27, 22 Stat. 403, is ?ot complete until the l?tter is deliared to the person from whom the eonirlbution is solicited, and ff tl? letter is r?cived by one within buildin? or room de?ribed in � of th? act the solicitation is in that plum and the ruder of the letter oommite t? p?ohibited oif? in t]? prchibitod pta?. lb. An indictment which clearly and distinctly cbarS? each and every elemant of t?e offen?e intended to be cheated, iud which distinctly advis? the cl?e?lant of what he is to mcot at tbe trial is sufficient; and so/?ld in this e?e ? to an indictment for a?ptin? ralmt? prohibited by F4ki,. Act, ?lthou?h the details of the derira by which the ?hates ?ived wsm not ?t out. Armoar Packi? Co. v. Ua? 8?a?, 56. While infant is to some extent ?entisl in the commi?on of crime, and without determlnln? whether a shipper honestly payin? s reduc[ed rate in the behe! that it is the publisl?d rate is liable under the statute, ? that shippers who pay ?uch a rate with iuli knowledge of the pub? lished rates, and ?ntend that they have & r?ht so to do, commit the o?e?e prohibited by the Elkins Act, and are subject to the penalties provided therein, even though their cont?mtion he s. ?istake of law. lb. ?qee 0ONrs'rl'r?'r?O?AL LAW, 2, 3, 9, ?a?smc-r?o?, D 2, a. CUBA. ? O?c?; Pa?c?eA? ? Ao?'r, 2. DAMAGES. ?qee L?I?UNCTION, 2. DECLARATIONS.
�
