Mexico Valley, foremost as teacher and apostle. Deserving and well fitted as he was for the post, the offer is said to have been due chiefly to*his relationship to Charles V.[1] He had more than once been urged by his superiors and others to accept preferment in his order and in the church, but had always declined to leave his humble position, and to this decision he still adhered. The see was thereupon bestowed, the 12th of December, 1527,[2] on Juan de Zumárraga,[3] guardian of the Franciscan convent of Abrojo.
The emperor was in the habit of retiring to this place occasionally for meditation, and had become impressed by the zeal and austerity of the friar, and by his efficient conduct in suppressing witchcraft in Biscay. Such qualities appeared to be needed in a country so racked by abominable superstitions and reckless factions, and as the first audiencia was about to leave for New Spain when the appointment was made, Zumárraga received orders to accompany them without waiting for consecration. He was invested with the additional power of protector of the Indians, and ordered to watch over the observance of the many laws issued in favor of his oppressed protégés.[4]
On arriving at Mexico he found it extremely difficult to carry out these instructions, for a check upon the ill treatment of the natives touched the nearest interests of the settlers. The audiencia instead of aid-
- ↑ See Beaumont, Crón. Mich., iii. 251.
- ↑ Cédula, in Ramirez, Doc., MS., 5, granting him control of tithes.
- ↑ He was born at Durango — 'at Zumárraga,' says Vetancurt, Menolog., 61, if so, a village subject to Durango — in 1468, and after assuming the Franciscan habit he rose rapidly to the positions of guardian, definidor, and provincial. Gonzalez Dávila, Teatro Ecles., i. 19 et seq.; Monumentos Domin. Esp., MS., 69; Torquemada, iii. 448.
- ↑ The bull confirming his appointment was issued only on September 2, 1530. Concilios Prov., 1555-65, 213. Beaumont adds, 'Clemente VII., en consistorio secreto de 12 Agosto de 1530 . . . erigió la catedral de México," Crón. Mich., iii, 251-3; and, confounding this act with the erection, he wrongly challenges Calle, Mem. y Not. Gonzalez Dávila, loc. cit., assumes that he was consecrated at Tlascala by Garcés, but he is wrong in both date and fact. The different letters of the two audiencias call him simply 'bishop elect.' Pacheco and Cárdenas, Col. Doc., xiii. 119, etc. We shall follow him back to Spain for consecration in a few years.
