U.S. Route Numbering Committee 1958-06-26
STATE |
ROUTE NO. |
DESCRIPTION |
MASSACHUSETTS NEW HAMPSHIREAPPROVED |
U. S. 1 Relocation |
(Massachusetts Section) Proposed marking would restore U. S. 1 to its former location from Danvers north to the New Hampshire State line via Newburyport over present Massachusetts Route 17. After the change is made Route 17 will be discontinued on that section. (Interstate Route 95 will replace U. S. 1 on its present location between Danvers and the connection with the New Hampshire Turnpike which has been designated Interstate Route 95 also.) |
APPROVED |
(New Hampshire Section) Proposed marking will involve about 700 feet in New Hampshire over the former location of U. S. 1. | |
SOUTH CAROLINADENIED | U. S. 1 Alternate Establishment of an Alternate U. S. Route |
The proposed marking of an Alternate Route U. S. 1 would begin on U. S. 1 in Columbia and run south on U. S. 21-176 and 321 about 6 miles, thence southerly on U. S. 321 to State Route 3 south of Swansea, thence southwesterly on State Route 3, via Springfield and Blackwell to State Route 37 at Barnwell, then southerly on State Route 37 via Baldock to U. S. 301 southwest of Allendale. |
"NO ACTION | U. S. 5 and U. S. 5A Renumbering of Existing U. S. Routes |
(No action can be taken on this application inasmuch as several states are involved and proper applications were not received in time to be included on the agenda.) |
" APPROVED |
U. S. 76-378 B.P. and B.R. Recognition of By-Pass and Business Route at Sumter |
The marking on the by-pass route would be over a new 4-lane controlled access highway skirting the city on the north and east. The business route would be marked over the present location of U. S. Routes 76 and 378 into and through the city. |
" APPROVED |
U. S. 501 B. P. and B. R. Recognition of By-Pass and Business Route at Conway |
The marking on the by-pass route would be over a new 4-lane facility passing south of the business district of the city. The business route would be marked over the present route into and through the city. |
VERMONTAPRROVED | U. S. 2 B.R. Recognition of a Business Route in Montpelier |
Proposed routing would be over former U.S. 2 through the city on Main and State Streets. |
OHIOAPPROVED | U. S. 6. Relocation |
This routing would be over Ohio State Route 384 which is being constructed as a high type highway and thereby avoiding a congested area in Bryan. |
" APPROVED |
U. S. 62 Relocation |
This routing would be over a new location between Canton and a point on old U. S. 62 north of Louisville. |
" APPROVED |
U. S. 68 Abandonment of Section |
This proposal would eliminate the portion of U. S. 68 between U. S. 25 north of Findlay and a point about 3 miles southwest of Findlay. (Apparently U. S. 68 has been eliminate by Ohio from a point just north of Findlay to its northern terminus in Toledo, and this proposal would make the northern terminal point of U. S. 68 the intersection with U.S. 25 southwest of Findlay.) |
" APPROVED |
U. S. 224 Relocation |
This routing would be over a new high standard highway by-passing Tiffin on the south and west. |
MISSISSIPPIAPPROVED | U. S. 11 By-Pass Abandonment |
This proposal would eliminate U. S. 11 By-Pass marking established June 27, 1957 at Hattiesburg. |
VIRGINIAAPPROVED | U. S. 13 Relocation |
Proposed marking would be over new routing leaving U. S. Routes 38 and 460 east of Suffolk at Magnolia then following present Virginia Route 337 southwesterly around and through the southeasterly part of Suffolk to present U. S. Route 13 in South Suffolk. Present U. S. Route 13 marking through the City proper would be eliminated and length of U. S. Route 13 would be reduced 0.10 mile. |
KENTUCKYAPPROVED | U. S. 31 E Relocation |
Proposed marking would be over a new high standard highway recently constructed between Lincoln Memorial Park and Magnolia. New routing would reduce travel distance on this route 2.5 miles. |
MISSOURIAPPROVED | U. S. 54 Relocation |
Proposed marking would be over a new high standard highway constructed between north Jefferson City and intersecting the present U. S. Route 54 north of Holts Summit. Old routing will be marked as State Supplementary Route AC. |
NEW MEXICODENIED | U. S. 56 Extension |
Proposed marking would extend U. S. 56 from Springer into Santa Fe via Las Vegas over U. S. Routes 85, 84 and 285. |
CALIFORNIAAPPROVED | U. S. 66-91-395 B.R. Recognition of a Business Route in San Bernardino |
Proposed routing would be over old route of U. S. 66-91-395 which has been changed to a new freeway type highway by-passing the business district. Old U. S. 66 B.R. will be eliminated from the Freevay east on 5th Street then north on E Street and Kendall Drive in San Bernardino. |
" APPROVED |
U. S. 91 B. R. Recognition of a Business Route in Riverside |
Proposed routing would be over old route of U. S. 91-395, which has been changed to a new freeway type highway by-passing the business district, between Columbia Street and the south city limits of Riverside. |
" APPROVED |
U. S. 99 B. R. Recognition of a Business Route in Madera |
Proposed routing would be over the old route of U. S. 99 which has been changed to a new freeway by-passing the business district between a point 0.5 miles south of Madera to a point .5 miles north of Madera. |
" APPROVED |
U. S. 101 B. R. Recognition of a Business Route in Arroyo Grande |
Proposed routing would be over the old route of U. S. 101 which has been changed to a new freeway by-passing the business district between a point southeast of Leedham Lane and a connection at Grand Avenue. |
" APPROVED |
U. S. 101 B. R. Recognition of a Business Route at Crescent City |
Proposed routing would be over former U. S. 101 which bas been changed to a location outside the business district. |
" APPROVED |
U. S. 466 Revision in Location |
Proposal calls for relocation of previously designated marked route between Shandon and Atascadero to a new routing via Paso Robles. Original location was never marked between Shandon and Atascadero. The new location would be over a newly improved highway between Shandom and Paso Robles, then coincident with U. S. 101 south from Paso Robles to Atascadero where it joins the original designated route. |
ALABAMAAPPROVED | U. S. 72 Establishment of an Alternate U. S. Route |
The proposed marking of an Alternate Route U. S. 72 would begin in Huntsville and follow State Route 20 southwesterly through Decatur thence westerly to Tuscumbia. |
" | U. S. 331 Extension |
Proposed marking would extend U. S. 331 from its present northern terminus in downtown Montgomery over U. S. 231 north through Watumpka, Sylacauga, Talladega and Lincoln to U. S. 431 through Albertsville and Guntersville to Henryville, then northeasterly over State Route 79 to U. S. 72 at Scottsboro to U. S. 431 in Attalla, thence northerly |
ACTION WITHHELD Action has been withheld pending a clarification by the State of the U.S. System in that State. State was asked to eliminate one of the two U. S. 231 routes and to stabilize their U. S. marking in the State. | ||
ARIZONADENIED | U. S. 93 Extension |
Proposed marking would extend U. S. 93 from Kingman to Wickenburg over present Arizona Route 93 to Arizona Route 71 then over new location into U. S. 89 at Vickenburg. |
NEW JERSEYAPPROVED | U. S. 130 and U. S. 130 A Abandonment |
This proposal would eliminate U. S. Route 130 marking between U. S. Route 1 south of New Brunswick and the northern terminal of U. S. 130 in New Brunswick. Would also eliminate alternate U. S. 130 markings. |
" APPROVED |
U. S. 206 Relocation |
Proposed marking would be over a new high standard highway built to by-pass the congested area of Columbus on the west. Old route would became New Jersey Route 170. |
KANSASAPPROVED | U. S. 160 Relocation |
Proposed marking would be over & high standard highway between McCune and U. S. Route 69 over former Kansas Route 103, then north on U. S. 69 over a new highway by-passing Pittsburg on the west side. |
OKLAHOMA | U. S. 169 Extension |
Proposed marking would extend U. S. 169 from its present southern terminus at Glenpool southerly through Okmulgee, Henryetta, Weleetka, Wetumka, Calvin, Ada and Tishomingo to Madill (U.S. 70). |
APPROVED subject to completion of route to primary standards and protection of all railroad grade crossings. | ||
MISSISSIPPI TENNESSEEDENIED |
NEW ROUTE Establishment of a U. S. Route |
{{center|(Mississippi Section) Proposed route would begin on U. S. Route 98 in Beaumont and extend north over Mississippi State Route 15 via Laurel, Newton, Philadelphia, Louisville, Ackerman, Maben, Houston, Pontotoc, New Albany, and Walnut to the Tennessee State line; there joining a route selected by Tennessee to continue northerly to Jackson, Tennessee. (Tennessee Section) Proposed route would begin at the Mississippi State line on Tennessee State Route 125 thence north through Pocahontas to Bolivar, thence over Tennessee Route 18 to U. S. 45 about four miles south of Jackson. |
OREGONDENIED | NEW ROUTE Establishment of U. S. Route 320 |
Proposed route would begin on U. S. 101 at Otis thence easterly over State Route 18 to Valley Junction thence southeasterly over State Route 22 through Salem, Stayton and Detroit, thence southerly to U. S. 20 as Santiam Junction. |
FLORIDAAPPROVED | U. S. 1 Relocation |
This marking would follow a new high-type facility recently opened to by-pass the congested business district of Homestead. |
" APPROVED |
U. S. 1 B. R. Recognition of a Business Route through Homestead |
The proposed routing would be over the former location of U. S. 1 through Homestead. |
" APPROVED |
U. S. 98 Relocation |
This marking would follow a new high-type facility recently opened to by-pass the congested business district of Dade City. |
" APPROVED |
U. S. 98 B. R. Recognition of a Business Route through Dade City |
This proposed routing would be over the former location of U. S. 98 through Dade City. |
" | U. S. 129 Relocation |
This marking would be over a newe: and better road (State Road 49) from Chiefland north via Trenton to U. S. 90 about two miles east of Live Oak, then westerly to present U. S. 129 in Live Oak. |
APPROVED subject to U. S. Markers being removed from the old route. |
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it was legally published within the United States (or the United Nations Headquarters in New York subject to Section 7 of the United States Headquarters Agreement) between 1929 and 1977 (inclusive) without a copyright notice.
This work may be in the public domain in countries and areas with longer native copyright terms that apply the rule of the shorter term to foreign works.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse