User talk:JavBol

What Wikisource is

Hi, I have not used Wikisource before, but my understanding is that we do not edit content in the way we do on Wikipedia, we simply reproduce published works. Our "editing" here comprises posting new documents and proofreading them to ensure there are no changes. Steelpillow (talk) 04:49, 17 June 2022 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikisource

Hello, JavBol, and welcome to Wikisource! Thank you for joining the project. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

• Help pages, especially for proofreading
• Help:Beginner's guide to Wikisource
• Style guide
• Inclusion policy
• Wikisource:For Wikipedians

You may be interested in participating in

• Proofread of the Month
• Monthly Challenge
• Requested texts

Add the code {{active projects}}, {{PotM}} or {{Collaboration/MC}} to your page for current Wikisource projects.

You can put a brief description of your interests on your user page and contributions to another Wikimedia project, such as Wikipedia and Commons.

Have questions? Then please ask them at either

• Wikisource:Scriptorium; or
• Wikisource:Scriptorium/Help

I hope you enjoy contributing to Wikisource, the library that is free for everyone to use! In discussions, please "sign" your comments using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username if you're logged in (or IP address if you are not) and the date. If you need help, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question here (click edit) and place {{helpme}} before your question.

Again, welcome! Beeswaxcandle (talk) 05:06, 17 June 2022 (UTC)

Explanation of reversions

At Wikisource our task is to reproduce the text of works as they are published—with typos and errors in grammar and punctuation. Some of the changes you have made in the Crystallography article in EB1911 are not in the published text, thus my reversions. As @Steelpillow: mentions above, we don't edit the content. If a page is marked in yellow (proofread), then going through it with a second pair eyes to ensure that the content matches the printed text is a very useful thing to do. At that point, we can mark the page as green (validated). Beeswaxcandle (talk) 05:06, 17 June 2022 (UTC)

Thanking & replying

@Steelpillow (talk • contribs) & Beeswaxcandle (talk • contribs): Thank you both for your explanations. But I must admit that I don't understand why on top of providing a scanned version of the original text, Wikisource provides an editable text, but forbids fixing little mistakes in it... In my opinion, while we are working on this text, we should make a Wikisource edition, even better than the 11th edition! B-) JavBol (talk) 15:35, 17 June 2022 (UTC)

Our primary mission is to provide the text as published, which makes it available as a RS for Wikipedia. "Fixing" the text is an annotation and can only be done in a separate copy of the text (see the linked policy). Alternatively, WikiBooks may be happy to host a "fixed" text. Beeswaxcandle (talk) 18:48, 17 June 2022 (UTC)

@Beeswaxcandle (talk • contribs): Thank you also for your latest explanations. But on the Crystallography article of EB1911, I can see just very few little mistakes (apart from a false figure, but fixing a figure would probably not be considered as annotating it)... So, is there already on Wikisource an annotated version of the Crystallography article of EB1911, please? :-P JavBol (talk) 20:01, 17 June 2022 (UTC)

I'm not aware of any EB1911 articles in the annotation space. There are certainly none in the category. Beeswaxcandle (talk) 00:03, 18 June 2022 (UTC)

Little mistakes to fix in a potential «annotated» copy of EB1911 Crystallography article

• On print p. 583 = WS p. 605:
  • « [...] two tetragonal prisms (a and m,) two tetragonal bipyramids (e and p), and one ditetragonal bipyramid (x, with 16 faces). »
  • « [...] two tetragonal prisms (a and m), two tetragonal bipyramids (e and p), and one ditetragonal bipyramid (x, with 16 faces). »