User talk:Testingitro
Add topic | This user is busy in real life and may not swiftly respond to queries. |
Welcome to Wikisource
Hello, Testingitro, and welcome to Wikisource! Thank you for joining the project. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:
- Help pages, especially for proofreading
- Help:Beginner's guide to Wikisource
- Style guide
- Inclusion policy
- Wikisource:For Wikipedians
You may be interested in participating in
Add the code {{active projects}}, {{PotM}} or {{Collaboration/MC}} to your page for current Wikisource projects.
You can put a brief description of your interests on your user page and contributions to another Wikimedia project, such as Wikipedia and Commons.
Have questions? Then please ask them at either
I hope you enjoy contributing to Wikisource, the library that is free for everyone to use! In discussions, please "sign" your comments using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username if you're logged in (or IP address if you are not) and the date. If you need help, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question here (click edit) and place {{helpme}} before your question.
Again, welcome! Beeswaxcandle (talk) 18:12, 4 April 2021 (UTC)
Index change
[edit]
This section is considered resolved, for the purposes of archiving. If you disagree, replace this template with your comment. 2021-05-10 Hi, I notice this change on my watchlist. Was it because I was making corrections? CYGNIS INSIGNIS 13:25, 19 April 2021 (UTC)
No consensus for newspaper moves
[edit]Hi. Please stop moving those random newspaper articles. There is no consensus for those moves, nor any need. Thanks. — billinghurst sDrewth 23:42, 10 May 2021 (UTC)
- I should add that that template is set up where we have a full scan of newspapers so it has to allow for that triple layer. For many works we are never going to get scans, or more than random articles, so having that hierarchy simply is burdensome and in some cases problematic. Noting that each of those forward slashes makes something a subpage. So the agreed position is that where we have spot articles, that we will take them to the year only. If we get heaps of works, and scans, then we can review on a case by case basis. More important to get their metadata correct in Wikidata. — billinghurst sDrewth 00:16, 11 May 2021 (UTC)
- I understand now. At least make it somewhat obvious that would be the case, unlike the vague & contradictory wording of "The naming has been standardized, but there is considerable variation in how it is implemented. [...] The optimal would be
Chicago Daily Tribune/1948/11/03/Dewey Defeats Trumanbut all the other variations exist, and at some time in the future they will need to be harmonized." from Portal:Newspapers. Testingitro (talk) 00:34, 11 May 2021 (UTC)
- I understand now. At least make it somewhat obvious that would be the case, unlike the vague & contradictory wording of "The naming has been standardized, but there is considerable variation in how it is implemented. [...] The optimal would be
There's not much a point in starting these stub film index pages because the bot that produces the transcripts does this entire process automatically. PseudoSkull (talk) 06:26, 26 June 2021 (UTC)