offence in his mind. Finding that he was suspected (probably with truth) of an intention to bring the soldiers over to the royalist side, he escaped to France. In 1823 he returned as an officer in one of the royalist regiments which had been organized on French soil by the consent of the government. He was now known as a thoroughly trustworthy servant of the despotic royalty, but he was too proud to be a courtier. For some years he was employed in bringing regiments which the government distrusted to order. He became lieutenant-colonel in 1825 and colonel in 1829. In 1832 he was named military governor of Ferrol. Before Ferdinand VII. died in 1833, Zumalacárregui was marked out as a natural supporter of the absolutist party which favoured the king's brother, Don Carlos. The proclamation of the king's daughter Isabella as heiress was almost the occasion of an armed conflict between him and the naval authorities at Ferrol, who were partisans of the constitutional cause. He was put on half pay by the new authorities and ordered to live under police observation at Pamplona. When the Carlist rising began on the death of Ferdinand he is said to have held back because he knew that the first leaders would be politicians and talkers. He did not take the field till the Carlist cause appeared to be at a very low ebb, and until he had received a commission from Don Carlos as commander-in-chief in Navarre. The whole force under his orders when he escaped from Pamplona on the night of the 29th of October 1833, and took the command next day in the Val de Araquil, was a few hundred ill-armed and dispirited guerrilleros. In a few months Zumalacárregui had organized the Carlist forces into a regular army. The difficulty he found in obtaining supplies was very great, for the coast towns and notably Bilbao were constitutional in politics. It was mainly by captures from the government troops that he equipped his forces. He gradually obtained full possession of Navarre and the Basque provinces, outside of the fortresses, which he had not the means to besiege. Whether as a guerrillero leader, or as a general conducting regular war in the mountains, he proved unconquerable. By July 1834 he had made it safe for Don Carlos to join his headquarters. The pretender was, however, a narrow-minded, bigoted man, who regarded Zumalacárregui with suspicion, and was afraid of his immense personal influence with the soldiers. Zumalacárregui had therefore to drag behind him the whole weight of the distrust and intrigues of the court. Yet by the beginning of June 1835 he had made the Carlist cause triumphant to the north of the Ebro, and had formed an army of more than 30,000 men, of much better quality than the constitutional forces. If Zumalacárregui had been allowed to follow his own plans, which were to concentrate his forces and march on Madrid, he might well have put Don Carlos in possession of the capital. But the court was eager to obtain command of a seaport, and Zumalacárregui was ordered to besiege Bilbao. He obeyed reluctantly, and on the 14th of June 1835 was wounded by a musket bullet in the calf of the leg. The wound was trifling and would probably have been cured with ease if he had been allowed to employ an English doctor whom he trusted. But Don Carlos insisted on sending his own physicians, and in their hands the general died on the 24th of June 1835 not without suspicion of poison. Zumalacárregui was a fine type of the old royalist and religious principles of his people. The ferocity with which he conducted the war was forced on him by the government generals, who refused quarter.
An engaging account of Zumalacárregui will be found in The Most Striking Events of a Twelvemonth Campaign with Zumalacárregui in Navarre and the Basque Provinces, by C. F. Henningsen (London, 1836). A chap-book called Vida politico y militar de Don Tomas Zumalacárregui, which gives the facts of his life with fair accuracy, is still very popular in Spain. (D. H.)
ZUMPT, The name of two German classical scholars. Karl
Gottlob Zumpt (1792-1894), who was educated at Heidelberg
and Berlin, was from 1812 to 1827 a schoolmaster in Berlin, and
in 1827 became professor of Latin literature at the university.
His chief work was his Lateinische Grammatik (1818), which
stood as a standard work until superseded by Madvig's in 1844.
He edited Quintilian's Institutio oratoria (1831), Cicero's Verrines
and De officiis (1837), and Curtius. Otherwise he devoted
himself mainly to Roman history, publishing Annales veterum regnorum et populorum
(3rd ed. 1862), a work in chronology
down to A.D. 476, and other antiquarian studies. His nephew,
August Wilhelm Zumpt (1815-1877), studied in Berlin, and
in 1851 became professor in the Friedrich Wilhelm Gymnasium.
He is known chiefly in connexion with Latin epigraphy, his
papers on which (collected in Commentationes epigraphicae,
2 vols., 1850-54) brought him into conflict with Mommsen in
connexion with the preparation of the Corpus inscriptionum Latinarum,
a scheme for which, drawn up by Mommsen, was
approved in 1847. His works include Monumentum Ancyranum
(with Franck, 1847) and De monumento Ancyrano supplendo
(1869); Studia Romana (1859); Das Kriminalrecht der rom. Republik
(1865-69); Der Kriminalprozess der rom. Republik
(1871); editions of Namatianus (1840), Cicero's Pro Murena
(1859) and De lege agraria (1861). Ihne incorporated materials
left by him in the 7th and 8th vols. of his Romische Geschichte (1840).
ZUNZ, LEOPOLD (1794-1886), Jewish scholar, was born at
Detmold in 1794, and died in Berlin in 1886. He was the
founder of what has been termed the "science of Judaism,"
the critical investigation of Jewish literature, hymnology and
ritual. Early in the 19th century he was associated with Gans
Moser and Heine in an association which the last named called
"Young Palestine." The ideals of this Verein were not destined
to bear religious fruit, but the "science of Judaism"
survived. Zunz took no large share in Jewish reform, but never
lost faith in the regenerating power of "science" as applied
to the traditions and literary legacies of the ages. He had
thoughts of becoming a preacher, but found the career uncongenial.
He influenced Judaism from the study rather than
from the pulpit. In 1832 appeared what E. H. Hirsch rightly
terms "the most important Jewish book published in the 19th
century." This was Zunz's Gottesdienstliche Vorträge der Juden,
i.e. a history of the Sermon. It lays down principles for the
investigation of the Rabbinic exegesis (Midrash, q.v.) and of the
prayer-book of the synagogue. This book raised Zunz to the
supreme position among Jewish scholars. In 1840 he was
appointed director of a Lehrerseminar, a post which relieved
him from pecuniary troubles. In 1845 appeared his Zur
Geschichte und Literatur, in which he threw light on the literary
and social history of the Jews. Zunz was always interested in
politics, and in 1848 addressed many public meetings. In 1850
he resigned his headship of the Teachers' Seminary, and was
awarded a pension. He had visited the British Museum in
Synagogale Poesie des Mittelalters (1855). It was from this
book that George Eliot translated the following opening of a
chapter of Daniel Deronda: "If there are ranks in suffering,
Israel takes precedence of all the nations" . . . &c. After its
publication Zunz again visited England, and in 1859 issued his
Ritus. In this he gives a masterly survey of synagogal rites.
His last great book was his Literaturgeschichte der synagogalen
Poesie (1865). A supplement appeared in 1867. Besides these
works, Zunz published a new edition of the Bible, and wrote
many essays which were afterwards collected as Gesammelte
Schriften. Throughout his early and married life he was the
champion of Jewish rights, and he did not withdraw from
public affairs until 1874, the year of the death of his wife Adelhei
Beermann, whom he had married in 1822.
See Emil G. Hirsch, in Jewish Encyclopedia, xii. 699-704. (I. A.)
ZURBARAN, FRANCISCO (1598-1662), Spanish painter, was born at Fuente de Cantos in Estremadura on the 7th of November 1598. His father was Luis Zurbaran, a country labourer, his mother Isabel Marquet. In childhood he set about imitating objects with charcoal; and his father sent him, still young, to the school of Juan de Roelas in Seville. Francisco soon became the best pupil in the studio of Roelas, surpassing the master himself; and before leaving him he had achieved a
