Page:Finch Group report.pdf/132

From Wikisource
Jump to navigation Jump to search
This page has been proofread, but needs to be validated.

132

savings in the other sectors of the economy. The ‘Others’ save £3.8m, meaning that the additional costs to the UK are only £0.6m.

  • If the APC was 50% greater than the academic institution breakeven point then costs to the institutions would be £11.0m more than the Central Case, with Others’ savings only offsetting this by £1.7m.

Sensitivity 2 - level of Gold uptake in the UK and rest of the world

Table 0.5: Results of sensitivity 2 (figures in £m)

Cost Category Central Case Sensitivity 2: level of Gold uptake in the UK and rest of the world
10% 30% 40% 50%
Academic Institutions Author-side payments 22.0 3.2
(-18.9)
31.6
(+9.6)
45.9
(+23.8)
60.1
(+38.1)
Subscriptions -18.7 -2.7
(+16)
-26.9
(-8.2)
-39.0
(-20.3)
-51.1
(-32.4)
Access Provision -3.5 -0.5
(+3)
-5.0
(-1.5)
-7.2
(-3.8)
-9.5
(-6)
Transition costs 0.2 Constant at £200k for academic institutions
Total 0.0 0.2
(+0.2)
-0.0
(-0.1)
-0.2
(-0.2)
-0.3
(-0.3)
Others Author-side payments 5.5 0.8
(-4.7)
7.9
(+2.4)
11.5
(+6)
15.0
(+9.5)
Subscriptions and other revenues -9.5 -1.4
(+8.1)
-13.6
(-4.1)
-19.7
(-10.2)
-25.8
(-16.3)
Access Provision -2.1 -0.3
(+1.8)
-3.0
(-0.9)
-4.3
(-2.3)
-5.7
(-3.6)
Transition Costs 0.8 Constant at £800k for Others
Total -5.2 -0.0
(+5.2)
-7.9
(-2.6)
-11.8
(-6.5)
-15.7
(-10.4)
Annual Total -5.2 -0.0
(+5.3)
-7.9
(-2.7)
-11.9
(-6.7)
-16.0
(10.7)
20-year NPV Net Total -76.9 1.3
(+78.2)
-116.7
(-39.8)
-175.7
(-98.8)
-234.7
(-157.8)


Key points to note are as follows:

  • Varying the level of Gold uptake does not have a significant impact on academic institutions’ net costs, because the APC has been set at the academic institutions breakeven point. For example, an increase from 23% (in the Central Case) to 50% causes a small change in annual academic institutions’ net costs (a saving of £0.3m). However,