Page:Finch Group report.pdf/133

From Wikisource
Jump to navigation Jump to search
This page has been proofread, but needs to be validated.

133

the savings for Others is much greater, £15.7m when the level of Gold uptake is set at 50%.

  • Substantial savings are made in access provision as the level of Gold increases. This results from libraries undertaking fewer activities in relation to procurement of journals and administration.

Sensitivity 3 - Level of uptake in rest of world versus UK

Table 0.6: Results of sensitivity 3 (figures in £m)

Cost Category Central Case Sensitivity 3: level of uptake in the rest of world versus UK
80% 60% 40% 20%
Academic Institutions Author-side payments 22.0 22.0
(0)
22.0
(0)
22.0
(0)
22.0
(0)
Subscriptions -18.7 -15.2
(+3.5)
-11.7
(+7.1)
-8.1
(+10.6)
-4.6
(+14.1)
Access Provision -3.5 -2.8
(+0.7)
-2.2
(+1.3)
-1.5
(+2)
-0.9
(+2.6)
Transition costs 0.2 Constant at £200k for academic institutions
Total 0.0 4.2
(+4.2)
8.4
(+8.4)
12.6
(+12.6)
16.8
(+16.8)
Others Author-side payments 5.5 5.5
(0)
5.5
(0)
5.5
(0)
5.5
(0)
Subscriptions and other revenues -9.5 -7.7
(+1.8)
-5.9
(+3.6)
-4.1
(+5.3)
-2.3
(+7.1)
Access Provision -2.1 -1.7
(+0.4)
-1.3
(+0.8)
-0.9
(+1.2)
-0.5
(+1.6)
Transition Costs 0.8 Constant at £800k for Others
Total -5.2 -3.1
(+2.2)
-0.9
(+4.4)
1.3
(+6.5)
3.5
(+8.7)
Annual Total -5.2 1.1
(+6.4)
7.5
(+12.7)
13.9
(+19.1)
20.2
(+25.5)
20-year NPV Net Total -76.9 16.7
(+93.6)
110.4
(+187.2)
204.0
(+280.9)
297.6
(+374.5)

Key points to note are as follows:

  • If, as this sensitivity shows, the rest of the world has a lower uptake of author-side payments compared to the UK (i.e. a lack of global participation) the increase in costs to the UK is potentially very large. For example, if the rest of the world only has 20% of the UK's level of Gold uptake, UK annual costs increase by £25.5m relative to the Central Case.