Jump to content

User talk:Azertus

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikisource
Latest comment: 3 years ago by Billinghurst in topic Just in case

Welcome to Wikisource

Hello, Azertus, and welcome to Wikisource! Thank you for joining the project. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

You may be interested in participating in

Add the code {{active projects}}, {{PotM}} or {{Collaboration/MC}} to your page for current Wikisource projects.

You can put a brief description of your interests on your user page and contributions to another Wikimedia project, such as Wikipedia and Commons.

Have questions? Then please ask them at either

I hope you enjoy contributing to Wikisource, the library that is free for everyone to use! In discussions, please "sign" your comments using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username if you're logged in (or IP address if you are not) and the date. If you need help, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question here (click edit) and place {{helpme}} before your question.

Again, welcome! — billinghurst sDrewth 14:09, 2 September 2014 (UTC)Reply

You're welcome

[edit]

If there's a better or more common way to dab, though, feel free to fix it. =) — LlywelynII 00:12, 12 September 2014 (UTC)Reply

[edit]

As I understood it, "related author" is for an author whose works are closely associated with the author in question (Gilbert & Sullivan, for example), not for an author who is a biological relation. But I am not finding any clarification in the documentation for the template. --EncycloPetey (talk) 15:48, 12 November 2018 (UTC)Reply

That's how I saw it too. I saw them as related since they wrote their book(s) together. But since the reciprocal links are already in the description it might have been overkill. I'll revert those edits. --Azertus (talk) 15:57, 12 November 2018 (UTC)Reply
I don't think I've ever used the "related author" parameter. I've always put the information in the notes because it's less visually obtrusive, especially if there is a Portal link and a Wikidata/Wikipedia link as well. --EncycloPetey (talk) 16:02, 12 November 2018 (UTC)Reply

Just in case

[edit]

You may be interested in {{topicmatcher}} that is set up in the Dictionary of Indian Biography bios, which will display a link to fire-0up and search for a page in Magnus's topicmatcher tool. It is a hidden tool in that you need to modify your CSS to see the link. I am planning to gadgetify it, just haven't yet. — billinghurst sDrewth 14:40, 26 May 2021 (UTC)Reply