Jump to content

User talk:MichaelPittman

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikisource
Latest comment: 4 years ago by MichaelPittman in topic The Philosophical Inquiry

Welcome to Wikisource

[edit]

Welcome

Hello, MichaelPittman, and welcome to Wikisource! Thank you for joining the project. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

You may be interested in participating in

Add the code {{active projects}}, {{PotM}} or {{CotW}} to your page for current wikisource projects.

You can put a brief description of your interests on your user page and contributions to another Wikimedia project, such as Wikipedia and Commons.

Have questions? Then please ask them at either


I hope you enjoy contributing to Wikisource, the library that is free for everyone to use! In discussions, please "sign" your comments using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your IP address (or username if you're logged in) and the date. If you need help, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question here (click edit) and place {{helpme}} before your question.

Again, welcome! --Xover (talk) 08:00, 19 May 2020 (UTC)Reply


The Philosophical Inquiry

[edit]

Just to let you know… The 1735 and 1890 editions have now been migrated to the "workspace" structure and proofread, and the results published where readers can find them. The author page at Author:Anthony Collins (1676-1729) now has a single entry for this work, that links to A Philosophical Inquiry Concerning Human Liberty. This page is a "versions page", which is how we deal with multiple editions of the same work. On the versions page are listed the two editions A Philosophical Inquiry Concerning Human Liberty (1735) and A Philosophical Inquiry Concerning Human Liberty (1890).

I've tried to make as few changes as I could, but some were inevitable. I hope you find the result to be to your satisfaction.

Regards, --Xover (talk) 19:07, 26 May 2020 (UTC)Reply

I am glad to receive your update. What I've seen in the changes is well done, including the clear organization, the new ToC added to the 1890 ed., the fleurons and side margins on the 1735 ed., etc. It looks highly readable and usable. Kind regards, —Mike (MichaelPittman (talk) 06:36, 27 May 2020 (UTC))Reply