User talk:Pi Delport
|
.jpg)
|
|
Welcome to Wikisource!
 |
Now that you're here, you're probably wondering...
Welcome! Thank you for joining Wikisource; we'd love for you to stick around and get more involved. We are a small community of approximately a hundred key people, with infinite help from random passersby. You might be wondering which of the two classes we consider you...well, I guess that's going to be up to you. You'll find we are own our little corner of the Wikimedia Foundation, free from all the drama, arguments and policy violations you may be used to seeing elsewhere. In fact, since we largely just republish exactly what others before us have already written, there is very little concern about "neutrality" for example. After all, if the text of a speech by Adolf Hitler is inflammatory and biased...wasn't that its purpose? If you're looking for a specific topic, you'll likely find it by navigating through Wikisource:Works, whether it's Portal:Islam or Portal:Mermaids. For overarching categories, you might be better looking at something like Category:Poems or Category:Novels. Of course, if you know the author's name, that's easiest of all, just plug in "Author:Rudyard Kipling" and you'll see everything he ever wrote (or was written about him!). |
|
Chances are, you have a favourite subject we don't cover very well...here's how to change that!
So, your favourite author or subject isn't very well represented on the project? Well as long as you make sure the texts fit the standards of Public Domain, you can add them yourself! (Like all rules, those are basic guidelines, if you want to play with exceptions to the rule, just ask any of the administrators for help) If the text doesn't already exist, just enter its name below and it will pre-load an editing page for you to set to work! Be sure to add {{no header}} to the top of the page, and then include categories so people can find it. If you can't think of any particular corners to improve on Wikisource, how about taking a look at Portal:Religious texts, Portal:Wars or Portal:Texts by Country for some ideas? Don't forget to list your contributions on those pages as well so others will find and read them in the future! |
Reading when you want, how you want
 |
|
Places to go, people to meet
 Well, if you've clicked all the way to this tab, you might as well plan on spending a few more hours acquainting yourself with our massive library. It's not perfect, sometimes there's an occasional misspelling or you'll see a text sorted incorrectly. So help us out, let us know, or fix it yourself! If you're bored and just wanting to grab a mop and bucket, then there are plenty of corners that need tidying. Works that need to be split into chapters, Works that need their licensing clarified, Works that need machine-read words corrected, Works that need page-numbers removed and Authors whose full names we don't know would all be a great place to start! |
Help us out
|
Yann (talk) 11:00, 27 August 2009 (UTC)
I've marked it as a possible copyright violation and placed it on Wikisource:Possible copyright violations#Scheme: An Interpreter for Extended Lambda Calculus. It's not PD-USGov, and there's not enough information about the publication history to say anything else about it.--Prosfilaes (talk) 20:08, 7 September 2009 (UTC)
- (Responded there, thanks.) --Piet Delport (talk) 00:11, 8 September 2009 (UTC)
- After I closed the discussion, it has been identified to me that we probably should be applying {{OTRS ticket}} to the work. Would you be so kind to refer to m:OTRS and provide the relevant details to info@wikisource.org so that the correspondence can be appropriately recorded and filed. Thanks. -- billinghurst (talk) 23:14, 1 October 2009 (UTC)
- (Thank you, responded there. --Piet Delport (talk) 15:40, 3 October 2009 (UTC))
- Rather than do those boring repetitive bits manually, we have Wikisource:Bot requests where one can leave a request to let a bot be bored. Often it is mine, however, others do have them. -- billinghurst (talk) 15:56, 3 October 2009 (UTC)
- Oh, it's no problem; i just wanted an explicit pointer to the discussion in case anyone reads this in future. --Piet Delport (talk) 16:02, 3 October 2009 (UTC)
- This is a damned impressive transcription, I'm in awe. Keep up the good work. Sherurcij Collaboration of the Week: Author:David Livingstone. 19:36, 7 October 2009 (UTC)
- Thank you for the vote of confidence! This is my first Wikisource contribution, learning as i go along, so feedback, criticism, and suggestions are especially appreciated. --Piet Delport (talk) 23:45, 7 October 2009 (UTC)
Hi. I see you moved it to title case. I just wanted to let you know you that unlike Wikipedia we do not enforce title case here (yet; maybe we will have a firmer convention some day), so you were not obliged to make the move you did. Personally I prefer to title my works using sentence case. (I've deleted the redirects, as requested) Hesperian 23:58, 7 October 2009 (UTC)
- Thank you. I went with sentence case initially following the style guide's recommendation, but then realized how out of place it looks when linked from elsewhere, where title case is by far the standard for this kind of work. I decided to better get the move over with quickly, before there are stable links to the old capitalization requiring the redirects to be maintained. --Piet Delport (talk) 01:30, 8 October 2009 (UTC)
- Fair enough. It is entirely up to you. Hesperian 01:34, 8 October 2009 (UTC)
Uploading open-access papers systematically
[edit]Hi there, I saw that you had signed up at Wikisource:WikiProject Academic Papers, so I thought I'd ask your opinion on scaling up the import of open-access materials, as discussed at Wikisource:Scriptorium#Scaling_up_the_import_of_open-access_sources. Thanks and cheers, -- Daniel Mietchen - WiR/OS (talk) 12:42, 10 August 2011 (UTC)