Jump to content

User talk:Billinghurst/2024

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikisource
Latest comment: 25 days ago by MediaWiki message delivery in topic Tech News: 2024-49

Global IP block exempt status on Commons - again

Good morning! Can I trouble you for Global IP block exempt status on my main account User:Beleg Tâl? Much obliged :) —Beleg Tâl (talk) 14:17, 2 January 2024 (UTC)

Tech News: 2024-02

MediaWiki message delivery 01:19, 9 January 2024 (UTC)

Tech News: 2024-03

MediaWiki message delivery 00:12, 16 January 2024 (UTC)

Tech News: 2024-04

MediaWiki message delivery 01:03, 23 January 2024 (UTC)

Tech News: 2024-05

MediaWiki message delivery 19:31, 29 January 2024 (UTC)

Tech News: 2024-06

MediaWiki message delivery 19:22, 5 February 2024 (UTC)

Tech News: 2024-07

MediaWiki message delivery 05:48, 13 February 2024 (UTC)

Tech News: 2024-08

MediaWiki message delivery 15:36, 19 February 2024 (UTC)

Tech News: 2024-09

MediaWiki message delivery 19:23, 26 February 2024 (UTC)

Two items for you

Billinghurst, I hope you aren't the cartoonist found dead in his or her home! I hope you are well, and fully alive.

Secondly, I made a mess trying to correct errors with William Wordsworth's "Poems, in Two Volumes". Wikisource didn't even have it listed although it has been uploaded to Commons and exists as a PDF via archive dot org. Wikipedia English correctly distinguishes between that 1807 work and Wordsworth's later, similar, "Poems" (1815, I think); however, Wikisource only has "Poems". The metadata in Wikidata is messed up because of these inconsistencies between Wikipedia and Wikisource. In trying to fix the situation, I made a mess that I don't know how to repair. Wikisource's Chris discovered what I did. I am working with him to try to clean my unsightly mess, but I wanted to let you know about the disconnect between the projects which was my motivation for being EXCESSIVELY BOLD and trying to take care of it on my own. I apologize. FeralOink (talk) 23:36, 28 February 2024 (UTC)

Tech News: 2024-10

MediaWiki message delivery 19:47, 4 March 2024 (UTC)

Tech News: 2024-11

MediaWiki message delivery 23:04, 11 March 2024 (UTC)

Tech News: 2024-12

MediaWiki message delivery 17:39, 18 March 2024 (UTC)

Tech News: 2024-13

MediaWiki message delivery 18:56, 25 March 2024 (UTC)

Tech News: 2024-14

MediaWiki message delivery 03:36, 2 April 2024 (UTC)

Tech News: 2024-15

MediaWiki message delivery 23:37, 8 April 2024 (UTC)

Tech News: 2024-16

MediaWiki message delivery 23:29, 15 April 2024 (UTC)

Tech News: 2024-17

MediaWiki message delivery 20:28, 22 April 2024 (UTC)

Tech News: 2024-18

MediaWiki message delivery 03:33, 30 April 2024 (UTC)

Tech News: 2024-19

MediaWiki message delivery 16:44, 6 May 2024 (UTC)

Tech News: 2024-20

MediaWiki message delivery 23:58, 13 May 2024 (UTC)

Tech News: 2024-21

MediaWiki message delivery 23:04, 20 May 2024 (UTC)

Tech News: 2024-22

MediaWiki message delivery 00:15, 28 May 2024 (UTC)

Transparency in the check user process

saw your comment on commons. Trust but verify. given the abuse of checkuser on Croatian and Chinese, you will need to have an audit trail to build trust. and you have a checkuser on wikidata blocking editathons, so training on discretion is needed. having a known audit trail with an aggregrate report to the community, will tend to discourage fishing, and encourage accountable functionary behavior. now that edit patterns are incorporated in filters and tools, audit use of filters with feedback as well. if you don't do that, trust in functionaries will continue to erode. --Slowking4digitaleffie's ghost 16:10, 3 June 2024 (UTC)

Tech News: 2024-23

MediaWiki message delivery 22:34, 3 June 2024 (UTC)

Tech News: 2024-24

MediaWiki message delivery 20:20, 10 June 2024 (UTC)

Tech News: 2024-25

MediaWiki message delivery 23:48, 17 June 2024 (UTC)

Tech News: 2024-26

MediaWiki message delivery 22:32, 24 June 2024 (UTC)

Tech News: 2024-27

MediaWiki message delivery 23:59, 1 July 2024 (UTC)

Tech News: 2024-28

MediaWiki message delivery 21:31, 8 July 2024 (UTC)

Tech News: 2024-29

MediaWiki message delivery 01:31, 16 July 2024 (UTC)

Tech News: 2024-30

MediaWiki message delivery 00:04, 23 July 2024 (UTC)

Alumni Oxonienses (earlier) vol. 2 hiatus

As stated on https://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Index:Alumni_Oxonienses_(1500-1714)_volume_2.djvu. It comes from https://archive.org/details/alumnioxoniensi00oxfogoog/page/n37/mode/1up (onwards). Today I came across another scan: https://archive.org/details/b24873275_0002/page/457/mode/2up. So we can transclude the missing from there, in due course. Charles Matthews (talk) 18:14, 23 July 2024 (UTC)

Eleanor Ledbetter

Hello,

I would like to ask you for some advice, as you are experienced in searching for authors' identities. Currently, I am going to add an article by Eleanor C. Ledbetter of the Cleveland Public Library, see here but I am uncertain about her identity. We have an author page for Author:Eleanor Ledbetter employed in the same library, who sometimes used the middle initial E. representing her maiden name Edwards. First I assumed that it is just a typo and they are the same person, but then I found the article Library Service For Foreing Born Urged in Arizona republican, June 29, 1922, mentioning Eleanor C. Ledbetter too. Could they make the same typo? It is not very probable that two Eleanor Ledbetters, differing in the middle initial, would work in the same local library in the same time, but I would like to know your opinion whether it is safe to assume they are the same person or we should we consider them two separate authors. -- Jan Kameníček (talk) 09:46, 27 July 2024 (UTC)

In case you had not found them Jan, here are a couple links that might be of interest: [168] [169] -Pete (talk) 16:44, 27 July 2024 (UTC)
Thank you, Pete. Unfortunately, our article by Eleanor C. Ledbetter is from 1919, which is much later, and so it must be a different person than the one in your links. --Jan Kameníček (talk) 21:18, 27 July 2024 (UTC)
Just noting that after some more research I came to the conclusion that it is one person. --Jan Kameníček (talk) 15:31, 2 August 2024 (UTC)

Tech News: 2024-31

MediaWiki message delivery 23:10, 29 July 2024 (UTC)

Tech News: 2024-32

MediaWiki message delivery 20:43, 5 August 2024 (UTC)

Tech News: 2024-33

MediaWiki message delivery 23:21, 12 August 2024 (UTC)

Tech News: 2024-34

MediaWiki message delivery 00:53, 20 August 2024 (UTC)

Tech News: 2024-35

MediaWiki message delivery 20:33, 26 August 2024 (UTC)

billinghurst sDrewth 12:42, 20 March 2017 (UTC)

Tech News: 2024-36

MediaWiki message delivery 01:07, 3 September 2024 (UTC)

Tech News: 2024-37

MediaWiki message delivery 18:52, 9 September 2024 (UTC)

Tech News: 2024-38

MediaWiki message delivery 00:02, 17 September 2024 (UTC)

Tech News: 2024-39

MediaWiki message delivery 23:36, 23 September 2024 (UTC)

Tech News: 2024-40

MediaWiki message delivery 22:20, 30 September 2024 (UTC)

FYI: Damage to NBD records by SDrewthbot

On or around 2021-09-06, SDrewthbot made a series of edits to the biographical records of A Naval Biographical Dictionary with edit summaries containing convert to {{Naval Biographical Dictionary}}. Most of these appear to have been fine, however, it seems that all of the records that had more than one <pages /> tag were damaged due to the bot script choosing to only grab the last <pages /> tag on the page. This was true for the 31 entries with addendum (effectively making each record contain only the Addenda entries instead of the main content records).

Here is an example of the damage introduced to the Fordyce, Alexander Dingwall entry which looked like this for over three years between 2021-09-06 and 2024-10-06 when I fixed it with this edit via this change to {{Naval Biographical Dictionary}}.

I believe I have corrected all 31 records now and I added section links for the "Addenda" via this change so I do not think there is anything to do, however, I thought you would know more about the potential ramifications of the original changes and would want to be appraised of the issue. Thank you, —Uzume (talk) 13:33, 6 October 2024 (UTC)

It seems Xover attempted to rectify these broken records on 2023-09-10 by changing the section names of the Addenda entries via changes like this (from PAWS with edit summaries containing section label has to equal the subpage name at which the entry is transcluded in order for the automatic logic to work) which caused them to transclude content again but only their addendum. The "automatic logic" could have been updated to work with the original "Addendum: " prefixed section naming but I choose to not revert such changes (leaving the main record sections and the addendum record sections with the same names). —Uzume (talk) 13:59, 6 October 2024 (UTC)

Tech News: 2024-41

MediaWiki message delivery 23:42, 7 October 2024 (UTC)

Tech News: 2024-42

MediaWiki message delivery 21:21, 14 October 2024 (UTC)

Tech News: 2024-43

MediaWiki message delivery 20:52, 21 October 2024 (UTC)

Tech News: 2024-44

MediaWiki message delivery 20:56, 28 October 2024 (UTC)

Tech News: 2024-45

MediaWiki message delivery 20:50, 4 November 2024 (UTC)

Tech News: 2024-46

MediaWiki message delivery 00:07, 12 November 2024 (UTC)

Tech News: 2024-47

MediaWiki message delivery 02:00, 19 November 2024 (UTC)

Tech News: 2024-48

MediaWiki message delivery 22:42, 25 November 2024 (UTC)

Tech News: 2024-49

MediaWiki message delivery 22:22, 2 December 2024 (UTC)