Wikisource:Administrators/Archives/DeirdreAnne

Doug (2018 renamed to User:DeirdreAnne)

2011-03 admin

Doug (talk • contribs) • activity • Global

Doug has been extremely active since the beginning of December 2010. In a few short months he has learnt a lot, and is busy doing whatever obviously needs to be done. He has started operating bots DougBot (talk • contribs) and Interwiki-Bot (talk • contribs), and has a few edits on a number of the other language subdomains. He is active in community discussions on the project and is also frequently participating in IRC discussions.

In addition to demonstrating suitability for sysop here for English Wikisource, Doug is also getting involved in Latin Wikisource, and I see sysop in his future there. It will be helpful for him to work among our sysop ranks here to gain a bit of experience before being left to his own devices on Latin Wikisource, where the infrastructure is less developed and there are fewer peers to call on.

p.s. he is also an admin on English Wikipedia, but I am sure he will be happy to resign from there if anyone holds that against him. John Vandenberg ^(chat) 12:35, 26 February 2011 (UTC)

• Nomination accepted. Thank you. --Doug.^{(talk • contribs)} 13:04, 26 February 2011 (UTC)
• Support, per John. Gold Hat (talk) 13:32, 26 February 2011 (UTC)
• Support, a very enthusiastic contributor, quickly adjusted to and became part of our community, and has a lot of good ideas for the future. Often present in IRC and happily helps others there. Always after my lucky charms scripts. Inductiveload—talk/contribs 14:16, 26 February 2011 (UTC)
• Support, dedicated to the project and a helpful contributor. —Spangineer (háblame) 15:53, 26 February 2011 (UTC)
• Support, per John; --Zyephyrus (talk) 18:21, 26 February 2011 (UTC)
• support/promoveatur He won't speak twenty languages, but I like his approach. He's willing to work on la.source and I'm very glad to collaborate with him. - εΔω 18:30, 26 February 2011 (UTC)
• Oppose (at this juncture) - While Doug has been a good contributor and has gone out of his way to be helpful and provide his input, I don't feel comfortable with way DougBot was lobbied for, actively persued secondary support for when the approval was in question and then after securing approval, the urgency for its use has gone silent and lays dormant for about a month now. I'm only speaking up here because I'd like to see Doug continue to provide en.WS specific support - not just, in my view, collect pins and badges acrosss the Wiki foundation. — George Orwell III (talk) 22:13, 26 February 2011 (UTC)
• Support participates across the space and would do no damage with tools, which is my criteria. Doug can have a level of (WP over-) urgency at times, and could well to equate WS with OktoberFest rather than Daytona, and that we truly want to give people time to participate. His beatings will continue as we redesign that WPishness though that can be with tools. — billinghurst sDrewth 23:17, 26 February 2011 (UTC)
• Support, per John. His interwiki bot did good work on de.ws. with iw-Links. Alkab (talk) 18:43, 27 February 2011 (UTC) (de.ws)
• Support, good to have more experience on board…JamAKiska (talk) 22:29, 1 March 2011 (UTC)
• Support, per why not. —§ stay (sic)! 13:20, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
• Support Knows what he is doing. Pmlineditor  Talk 11:39, 3 March 2011 (UTC)

Appointed--BirgitteSB 14:53, 7 March 2011 (UTC)

2012-04 confirmation

Administrator since March 2011 (see previous discussions), currently active (contributions · logs · count · crossactivity). Doug will be reconfirmed automatically unless at least three established users oppose, which will trigger a vote of confidence with decision by simple majority.

Note, I have been somewhat light on my activity the past few months due to a need to focus on getting a new job and going away to training and probably will remain so due to a job change and international move; however, I intend to continue to lurk and check e-mail notices and will take admin actions when I see a need but my log actions will likely be low for a while. Hopefully, I'll be back to some editing and more active admin work by mid-summer.--Doug.^{(talk • contribs)} 18:13, 1 April 2012 (UTC)

• Support — :-|  George Orwell III (talk) 15:19, 1 April 2012 (UTC)
• Support--Mpaa (talk) 15:49, 1 April 2012 (UTC)
• Support — billinghurst sDrewth 17:18, 1 April 2012 (UTC)
• Support— Ineuw talk 19:45, 1 April 2012 (UTC)
• Support --Spangineer (háblame) 19:50, 1 April 2012 (UTC)
• Support --Eliyak T·C 14:23, 2 April 2012 (UTC)
• Support ----Zyephyrus (talk) 23:04, 4 April 2012 (UTC)
• Support—Beeswaxcandle (talk) 09:05, 5 April 2012 (UTC)
• Support AKA Londonjackbooks 16:09, 9 April 2012 (UTC)
• Support - AdamBMorgan (talk) 18:29, 9 April 2012 (UTC)

Confirmed. Hesperian 00:25, 1 May 2012 (UTC)

2013-05 confirmation

Administrator since March 2011 (see previous discussions), currently active (contributions · logs · count · crossactivity). Doug will be reconfirmed automatically unless at least three established users oppose, which will trigger a vote of confidence with decision by simple majority.

• Support Beeswaxcandle (talk) 05:32, 2 May 2013 (UTC)
• Support —Maury (talk) 05:35, 2 May 2013 (UTC)
• Support --Mpaa (talk) 06:40, 2 May 2013 (UTC)
• Support — billinghurst sDrewth 08:42, 2 May 2013 (UTC)
• Support --Zyephyrus (talk) 14:17, 2 May 2013 (UTC)
• Support - AdamBMorgan (talk) 11:34, 22 May 2013 (UTC)
• Support - Clockery Fairfield ^{(talk·contribs)} 16:50, 27 May 2013 (UTC)
• Support — Ineuw talk 16:27, 30 May 2013 (UTC)
• Support — ResScholar (talk) 08:09, 31 May 2013 (UTC)

2014-06 confirmation

Administrator since March 2011 (see previous discussions), currently inactive (contributions · logs · count · crossactivity). Doug will be removed automatically unless a simple majority of established users support continued access.

Note: has not edited here in the past six months; 34 edits and 3 admin actions in the previous six months; similarly inactive on other Wikimedia projects. Hesperian 02:30, 1 June 2014 (UTC)

•  Abstain —Clockery Fairfeld (ƒ=ma) 03:55, 1 June 2014 (UTC)
•  Support ----Zyephyrus (talk) 20:51, 1 June 2014 (UTC)
•  Support happy to extend for another 12 months and hoping that he will be back — billinghurst sDrewth 16:11, 3 June 2014 (UTC)
•  Support — Ineuw talk 03:48, 10 June 2014 (UTC)
•  Support — AuFCL (talk) 04:24, 30 June 2014 (UTC)
•  Abstain--Jusjih (talk) 19:48, 30 June 2014 (UTC)

2015-07 confirmation

Administrator since March 2011 (see previous discussions), currently active (contributions · logs · count · crossactivity). Doug will be reconfirmed automatically unless at least three established users oppose, which will trigger a vote of confidence with decision by simple majority.

•  Support --Zyephyrus (talk) 04:41, 2 July 2015 (UTC)
•  Support — Ineuw talk 13:37, 3 July 2015 (UTC)
•  Support BD2412 T 13:51, 3 July 2015 (UTC)
•  Support --EncycloPetey (talk) 19:15, 6 July 2015 (UTC)
•  Support — billinghurst sDrewth 12:27, 9 July 2015 (UTC)
•  Support--Jusjih (talk) 03:24, 15 July 2015 (UTC)
•  Support — George Orwell III (talk) 03:51, 15 July 2015 (UTC)
•  Support - Green Giant (talk) 03:06, 16 July 2015 (UTC)

2016-08 confirmation

admin since March 2011 (see previous discussions), currently active (contributions · logs · count · crossactivity). Doug will be reconfirmed automatically unless at least three established users oppose, which will trigger a vote of confidence with decision by simple majority.

•  Keep --Zyephyrus (talk) 19:13, 1 August 2016 (UTC)
•  Oppose -- No significant activity this year. Outlier59 (talk) 00:39, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
•  Keep — Ineuw talk 01:26, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
•  Keep no reason not to, though I would like to see more activity — billinghurst sDrewth 06:18, 4 August 2016 (UTC)
•  Neutral for some inactivity.--Jusjih (talk) 02:26, 28 August 2016 (UTC)
•  Neutral — Ineuw talk 05:31, 28 August 2016 (UTC)

2017-09 confirmation

admin since March 2011 (see previous discussions), currently active (contributions · logs · count · crossactivity). Doug will be reconfirmed automatically unless at least three established users oppose, which will trigger a vote of confidence with decision by simple majority.

•  Support --EncycloPetey (talk) 03:42, 1 September 2017 (UTC)
•  Support --Zyephyrus (talk) 17:26, 1 September 2017 (UTC)
•  Support - no problem here. BD2412 T 20:59, 1 September 2017 (UTC)
•  Support — billinghurst sDrewth 08:06, 2 September 2017 (UTC)
•  Support--Jusjih (talk) 03:55, 7 September 2017 (UTC)
•  Support — Ineuw talk 19:49, 7 September 2017 (UTC)

2018-10 confirmation

admin since March 2011 (see previous discussions), currently active (contributions · logs · count · crossactivity). DeirdreAnne will be reconfirmed automatically unless at least three established users oppose, which will trigger a vote of confidence with decision by simple majority.

•  Support — Hrishikes (talk) 08:25, 1 October 2018 (UTC)
•  Support --Zyephyrus (talk) 21:50, 1 October 2018 (UTC)
•  Comment Only 16 edits in the past three years makes me wonder whether he's out of touch with current norms. --EncycloPetey (talk) 00:42, 2 October 2018 (UTC)
•  Support heard from them recently inquiring about a username change, my understanding is it is their intention to be back soon. I am happy for the retention of rights for another year with that expectation. — billinghurst sDrewth 11:23, 2 October 2018 (UTC)
•  Support per information provided by billinghurst. BD2412 T 03:53, 8 October 2018 (UTC)
•  Support--Jusjih (talk) 04:02, 8 October 2018 (UTC)
•  Comment--Hi everyone. I'm the user formerly known as "Doug". I've been lurking here and there now and then but getting around to a name change was holding me back from doing much so I hope to change that in the near future now that this is address. Sorry for my long absence. Thanks billinghurst for letting people know and for your support. --DeirdreAnne^{(talk • contribs)} 17:12, 8 October 2018 (UTC)
•  Support — Ineuw talk 08:15, 16 October 2018 (UTC)
•  Comment—The SUL is unresolved when I checked, but I see there is action on it. Two questions: Who is seeking to verify the transfer of the account's history and tools across wikimedia? And will this 'single user login' be unique? — CYGNIS INSIGNIS 13:47, 16 October 2018 (UTC)

Unresolved? This should be complete, do you see some outstanding issue? As far as I can tell, this is my global user name, my history and tools came with automagically, and I have obtained the former username in order to ensure that it remains dormant. I have a lot of user pages to update and some of the information about what tools I have where is out of date but I will be doing so soon.--DeirdreAnne^{(talk • contribs)} 03:10, 23 October 2018 (UTC)

"but I see there is action on it." Seems to be resolved by password now. I thought or imagined that username transfers were 'given a tick in a non-automatic way' when extended rights, sysop and bureaucrat, were being enabled, for what I think or imagine are obvious reasons. You may know better, having been active in extending those rights to others at a sister site [and here, now that I think about it], so I might learn something. People having unique accounts is a thing with me at this little sister, so I prefer it when others give assurances about that [only two people have objected to me asking]. Other than that I have no objections and expect a benefit to the site. Regards, CYGNIS INSIGNIS 12:26, 27 October 2018 (UTC)

OK, I wasn't trying to be snotty but it kind of looks like it now that I re-read it. Sorry if it was. Just trying to understand what the issue was. I agree with you that unique accounts are important. I don't really understand the name change process, I haven't been involved in name changes for about a decade, SUL was new or developing iirc and usernames back then could be created on a single wiki. I don't know but I don't think that's possible anymore. Or at least not possible for normal users.--DeirdreAnne^{(talk • contribs)} 22:10, 29 October 2018 (UTC)

•  Support —C. F. 16:45, 26 October 2018 (UTC)
•  Support -- Good to have you back, DeirdreAnne, and hope to see you around more. :) --Mukkakukaku (talk) 15:58, 27 October 2018 (UTC)
•  Support —Beleg Tâl (talk) 19:40, 27 October 2018 (UTC)

2019-11 confirmation (not confirmed)

The following discussion is closed:

Not confirmed

admin since March 2011 (see previous discussions), currently inactive (contributions · logs · count · crossactivity). DeirdreAnne will be removed automatically unless a simple majority of established users support continued access.

•  Support. BD2412 T 05:21, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
•  Oppose for inactivity, with no prejudice to regaining bit if they become active again. Their previous confirmation was already slim due to inactivity, and as it stands they have not meaningfully been active since 2015. --Xover (talk) 10:23, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
•  Support --Zyephyrus (talk) 15:05, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
•  Comment I've changed the nomination header from "active" to "inactive"; there have been no edits in 12 months, which is significantly less activity than the threshold outlined in the policy (i.e. no edits in 6 months and no more than 50 edits in the 6 months prior to that). —Beleg Tâl (talk) 15:09, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
  • On further inspection, it appears that this admin's last edit on this project was her last edit on any Wikimedia project to date. BD2412 T 19:39, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
•  Oppose for inactivity only. --EncycloPetey (talk) 00:54, 9 November 2019 (UTC)
•  Oppose per EncycloPetey — billinghurst sDrewth 10:18, 9 November 2019 (UTC)

Admin rights have now been removed.[1] I have also removed their AduseFilterEditor right, on grounds of inactivity. It can easily be restored later if required. Hesperian 22:58, 8 December 2019 (UTC)