Wikisource:Administrators/Archives/Londonjackbooks

Londonjackbooks

2016-01 admin

Londonjackbooks (talk • contribs) • activity • Global

It is with, what I consider, a great privilege that I would like to nominate Londonjackbooks for the role of administrator. LJB is a long term editor and one of our true specialists on the poetic arts, and women writers, let alone being an assiduous proofreader, and a person who politely challenges questionable acts and inconsistencies. LJB has contributed widely in main, page, index, author and wikisource namespace, amassed 70k edits, and long been a "go to" person for types of works. They have long resisted admin tools through a natural reservation, that has recently changed with a few tasks that, while eminently qualified to undertake, they couldn't. After some consideration LJB has allowed me to make this nomination. I invite Londonjackbooks to formally accept this nomination. — billinghurst sDrewth 14:30, 26 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, Billinghurst. I accept the nomination. Londonjackbooks (talk) 14:33, 26 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Support per nom. — billinghurst sDrewth 14:30, 26 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support --EncycloPetey (talk) 15:49, 26 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Hrishikes (talk) 15:57, 26 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support in a very warm tone of voice. Beeswaxcandle (talk) 16:39, 26 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Mpaa (talk) 20:23, 26 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Zyephyrus (talk) 23:57, 26 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support —Beleg Tâl (talk) 04:24, 27 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support I am not necessarily sure this is a kind act but she should do well. AuFCL (talk) 05:45, 27 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support per nom. BD2412 T 15:09, 27 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support Absolutely. Actually I am surprised that this didn't happen earlier. — Ineuw talk 20:00, 29 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support Charles Matthews (talk) 05:15, 30 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support Oh yes. —C. F. 14:24, 31 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Prosody (talk) 01:28, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion is closed:

Successful. Hesperian 03:18, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

2017-03 confirmation

admin since February 2016 (see previous discussions), currently active (contributions · logs · count · crossactivity). Londonjackbooks will be reconfirmed automatically unless at least three established users oppose, which will trigger a vote of confidence with decision by simple majority.

Support --EncycloPetey (talk) 04:57, 1 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Support — billinghurst sDrewth 06:33, 1 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Support BethNaught (talk) 08:54, 1 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Support —Beleg Tâl (talk) 13:07, 1 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Support –Dick Bos (talk) 16:47, 1 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Zyephyrus (talk) 02:25, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Mukkakukaku (talk) 01:23, 3 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Jusjih (talk) 22:09, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Support BD2412 T 01:57, 8 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

2018-04 confirmation

admin since February 2016 (see previous discussions), currently active (contributions · logs · count · crossactivity). Londonjackbooks will be reconfirmed automatically unless at least three established users oppose, which will trigger a vote of confidence with decision by simple majority.

Support, no hesitation. BD2412 T 03:08, 3 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Zyephyrus (talk) 09:19, 3 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support —Beleg Tâl (talk) 23:59, 3 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --EncycloPetey (talk) 00:51, 4 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Hrishikes (talk) 02:17, 4 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support Mahir256 (talk) 03:14, 4 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Ineuw talk 04:19, 6 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

2019-05 confirmation

admin since February 2016 (see previous discussions), currently active (contributions · logs · count · crossactivity). Londonjackbooks will be reconfirmed automatically unless at least three established users oppose, which will trigger a vote of confidence with decision by simple majority.

Support --Zyephyrus (talk) 08:27, 1 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Xover (talk) 10:22, 1 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Support Ankry (talk) 15:15, 1 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Support --BethNaught (talk) 18:52, 1 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Support Pete (talk)
Support — Hrishikes (talk) 02:25, 2 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Support –MJL ‐Talk‐^☖ 18:22, 2 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Support --EncycloPetey (talk) 18:33, 2 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Support BD2412 T 02:25, 3 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Support Ineuw (talk) 20:55, 19 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral for too many missing edit summaries.--Jusjih (talk) 02:42, 27 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Support Extremely helpful user. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 02:57, 28 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

2020-06 confirmation

admin since February 2016 (see previous discussions), currently active (contributions · logs · count · crossactivity). Londonjackbooks will be reconfirmed automatically unless at least three established users oppose, which will trigger a vote of confidence with decision by simple majority.

Support, but noting that the logs show only one admin action in the last 12 months. --Xover (talk) 06:43, 1 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Zyephyrus (talk) 12:17, 1 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support BD2412 T 17:26, 3 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Engaged & helpful Pete (talk) 03:29, 4 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
support — billinghurst sDrewth 00:06, 5 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Jusjih (talk) 01:38, 8 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --DannyS712 (talk) 09:29, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support ミラ P 06:44, 21 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]