Wikisource:Administrators/Archives/Mukkakukaku

Mukkakukaku

2017-02 admin

The following discussion is closed:

Successful

Mukkakukaku (talk • contribs) • activity • Global

I would like to put before the community a nomination for Mukkakukaku to be given the admin bit. They have been with the community for over three years, currently approaching 10k edits, and contributions across multiple namespaces, and importantly in Wikisource: ns. Mukkakukaku doesn't seek out dramaz and contributes thoughtfully. I believe that Mukkakukaku understands our more understated administrative processes and consultative approachand and recommend this nomination to the community. — billinghurst sDrewth 10:55, 3 February 2017 (UTC)

Thank you for the nomination, which I accept. I have familiarized myself with the WS:Adminship policies and am eager to continue to help support this community. --Mukkakukaku (talk) 02:46, 4 February 2017 (UTC)

•  Support --Zyephyrus (talk) 14:20, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
•  Support —Beleg Tâl (talk) 16:56, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
•  Support— Mpaa (talk) 20:29, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
•  Support --EncycloPetey (talk) 20:34, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
•  Support--Prosfilaes (talk) 00:39, 4 February 2017 (UTC)
•  Support, but may I ask for your language skill, please?--Jusjih (talk) 02:49, 10 February 2017 (UTC)

I'm fluent in English and Spanish, I can read Polish and converse at a very basic level. I can understand, to a very basic extent, some amount of Serbo-Croatian and French. --Mukkakukaku (talk) 02:53, 10 February 2017 (UTC)

•  Support, easily. Cheers! BD2412 T 12:41, 11 February 2017 (UTC)
•  Support-- I’ve personally found Mukkakukaku to be friendly, helpful, and he uses very good manners.—Maury (talk) 05:40, 12 February 2017 (UTC)

Closing as successful. Hesperian 02:57, 13 February 2017 (UTC)

Appointed.[1] Hesperian 03:08, 13 February 2017 (UTC)

2018-02 confirmation

admin since February 2017 (see previous discussions), currently active (contributions · logs · count · crossactivity). Mukkakukaku will be reconfirmed automatically unless at least three established users oppose, which will trigger a vote of confidence with decision by simple majority.

•  Keep — billinghurst sDrewth 05:47, 2 February 2018 (UTC)
•  Keep --Prosfilaes (talk) 17:42, 2 February 2018 (UTC)
•  Keep --Zyephyrus (talk) 20:03, 2 February 2018 (UTC)
•  Keep —C. F. 18:02, 4 February 2018 (UTC)
•  Keep--Jusjih (talk) 02:08, 6 February 2018 (UTC)
•  Keep — Ineuw talk 21:19, 6 February 2018 (UTC)
•  Keep — BD2412 T 02:21, 7 February 2018 (UTC)
•  Keep — Hrishikes (talk) 14:09, 7 February 2018 (UTC)

2019-03 confirmation

admin since February 2017 (see previous discussions), currently active (contributions · logs · count · crossactivity). Mukkakukaku will be reconfirmed automatically unless at least three established users oppose, which will trigger a vote of confidence with decision by simple majority.

•  Support BD2412 T 15:18, 1 March 2019 (UTC)
•  Support Prosfilaes (talk) 22:03, 1 March 2019 (UTC)
•  Support--Jusjih (talk) 04:01, 3 March 2019 (UTC)
•  Support --Zyephyrus (talk) 16:00, 3 March 2019 (UTC)
•  Support — Hrishikes (talk) 16:08, 3 March 2019 (UTC)
•  Support — Ineuw talk 10:41, 9 March 2019 (UTC)
•  Support –MJL ‐Talk‐^☖ 18:51, 17 March 2019 (UTC)
•  Support --EncycloPetey (talk) 23:38, 17 March 2019 (UTC)

2020-04 confirmation

admin since February 2017 (see previous discussions), currently active (contributions · logs · count · crossactivity). Mukkakukaku will be reconfirmed automatically unless at least three established users oppose, which will trigger a vote of confidence with decision by simple majority.

•  Support. Recently inactive, but not long enough to take away the bit from a good contributor. BD2412 T 02:07, 1 April 2020 (UTC)
•  Support. --Zyephyrus (talk) 13:58, 1 April 2020 (UTC)
•  Support --DannyS712 (talk) 19:42, 1 April 2020 (UTC)
•  Support --Xover (talk) 13:18, 6 April 2020 (UTC)
•  Support -Pete (talk) 14:54, 12 April 2020 (UTC)
•  Support — Ineuw (talk) 10:25, 15 April 2020 (UTC)
•  Support--Prosfilaes (talk) 12:08, 15 April 2020 (UTC)
•  Neutral while recently inactive.--Jusjih (talk) 00:27, 21 April 2020 (UTC)
•  Question Two contributors called the applicant inactive while the heading says active. So I would like to ask Mukkakukaku about their future plans in the project. --Jan Kameníček (talk) 19:50, 21 April 2020 (UTC)

2021-05 confirmation (unsuccessful)

Admin since February 2017 (see previous discussions), currently inactive (contributions · logs · count · crossactivity). Mukkakukaku will be removed automatically unless a simple majority of established users support continued access.

• @BD2412: Mukkakukaku … has not edited during the past six months and has not made more than 50 edits during the last year. They thus fall under the inactivity provisions of the restricted access policy.
  @Mukkakukaku: You've only a handful of global edits in the last 2+ years. Are you planning to be active again in the near(ish) future? --Xover (talk) 06:54, 1 May 2021 (UTC)

1.  Oppose Has not edited here since December 2018. --EncycloPetey (talk) 22:43, 1 May 2021 (UTC)
2.  Oppose. Too inactive.--Jusjih (talk) 03:45, 3 May 2021 (UTC)
3.  Oppose, for inactivity. Unfortunately, Mukkakukaku has been inactive for two terms and has not even stopped to answer a question during the previous confirmation discussion, so the chance of their sudden appearance is minimal. Hope nothing bad happened to them… --Jan Kameníček (talk) 17:01, 10 May 2021 (UTC)
4.  Oppose, of course without any prejudice to returning the bit at any time in future, just ask :-) Inductiveload—talk/contribs 11:29, 31 May 2021 (UTC)

The following discussion is closed:

Not confirmed due to inactivity. Request for removal of rights submitted at Meta. BD2412 T 02:12, 1 June 2021 (UTC)