Wikisource:Administrators/Archives/Jusjih

Please do not post any new comments on this page.

This is a discussion archive collecting requests for restricted access by Jusjih.

See current discussion or the archives index.

Jusjih

Latest comment: 11 months ago147 comments58 people in discussion

2005-09 admin

I would like to apply for adminship here as well. I am already an administrator at the old multilingual Wikisource. --Jusjih 08:02, 15 September 2005 (UTC)
Support Yann 18:20, 15 September 2005 (UTC)
Support Dovi 18:41, 15 September 2005 (UTC)
Support—Zhaladshar ^(Talk) 21:00, 15 September 2005 (UTC)
- Appointed—Zhaladshar ^(Talk) 20:37, 18 September 2005 (UTC)

2006-09 confirmation

status	administrator since 18 September 2006 (unanimous)
activity	active (contributions, logs)
discussions	adminship (passed)

Support continued adminship. —{admin} Pathoschild01:52, 7 September 2006 (UTC)
Support continued adminship. --BirgitteSB 01:57, 7 September 2006 (UTC)
Support continued adminship.--Shanel 04:00, 7 September 2006 (UTC)
Support continued adminship.—Zhaladshar ^(Talk) 16:52, 7 September 2006 (UTC)
Support continued adminship. - Politicaljunkie 22:06, 7 September 2006 (UTC)
Support continued adminship. - AllanHainey 11:56, 11 September 2006 (UTC)

Confirmed. —{admin} Pathoschild 22:44, 8 October 2006 (UTC)

2007-10 confirmation

status	administrator since 18 September 2005 (unanimous)
activity	active (contributions, logs)
discussions	2005-09-18: adminship (passed) 2006-09: confirmation (passed)

Support continued access. —{admin} Pathoschild 04:08:05, 01 October 2007 (UTC)
Support continued access--BirgitteSB 12:52, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
Support continued access. —Benn Newman ^(AMDG) 13:10, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
Support continued access. FloNight 20:22, 2 October 2007 (UTC)
Support continued access. - Politicaljunkie 20:04, 3 October 2007 (UTC)
Support continued access.—Zhaladshar ^(Talk) 18:32, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
Support continued access. John Vandenberg 23:22, 8 October 2007 (UTC)
Support even though it's not needed. :) ++Lar: t/c 01:09, 9 October 2007 (UTC)
Support, keep up the good work. Dovi 20:50, 9 October 2007 (UTC)
Support continued access. --Spangineer^wp (háblame) 02:31, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
Support continued access. ThomasV 07:04, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
Support.--GrafZahl (talk) 11:52, 23 October 2007 (UTC)

Confirmed. ++Lar: t/c 02:36, 2 December 2007 (UTC)

2008-11 confirmation

status	administrator since 18 September 2005 (unanimous)
activity	active (contributions, logs)
discussions	2005-09: adminship (passed) 2006-09: confirmation (passed) 2007-10: confirmation (passed)

I favour confirmation; active and productive user. —Pathoschild 00:09:07, 05 November 2008 (UTC)
Confirm, active but quite. Jeepday (talk) 00:49, 5 November 2008 (UTC)
Confirm, John Vandenberg ^(chat) 01:00, 5 November 2008 (UTC)
Confirm — Jack Merridew 10:49, 5 November 2008 (UTC)
Confirm. --Zyephyrus (talk) 12:52, 6 November 2008 (UTC)
Confirm. Durova (talk) 23:52, 6 November 2008 (UTC)
Confirm EVula // talk // 06:13, 7 November 2008 (UTC)
Confirm—Zhaladshar ^(Talk) 16:47, 8 November 2008 (UTC)
Confirm--Shanel (talk) 02:43, 10 November 2008 (UTC)
Confirm productive user, positive contributor to the project. Cirt (talk) 01:46, 11 November 2008 (UTC)
Confirm. Synergy 05:34, 11 November 2008 (UTC)
Confirm FloNight (talk) 18:28, 11 November 2008 (UTC)
Confirm.--GrafZahl (talk) 10:54, 12 November 2008 (UTC)
Confirm--Suicidalhamster (talk) 15:16, 19 November 2008 (UTC)

2009-12 confirmation

Administrator since 18 September 2005 (see previous discussions), currently active (contributions · logs · count · crossactivity). Jusjih will be reconfirmed automatically unless at least three established users oppose, which will trigger a vote of confidence with decision by simple majority.

- Self statement: First, I would like to thank all supporters since the past time. Since using Multilingual Wikisource before having language subdomains, I started liking source texts and I still like them. While administering English Wikisource, I have seen growing development here. Challenges are also in our way. For example, whether United Nations resolutions would be copyrighted once troubled us, until evidence of licensing became found, which would also clear Chinese and French Wikisources of the turmoil. Being the only administrator of both English and Chinese Wikisources, I always feel myself like an important bridge. To better comply with our copyright policy, Wikisource:Possible copyright violations/Special discussion for pages tagged as PD-manifesto is a major ongoing discussion while Canadian Wikilivres:, where I also administer, has much better position to host public manifestos that we have often presumed them in the "public domain", only to see likely abuse of that copyright "license". Once again, thanks for your supports and I look forward to bringing more improvement.--Jusjih (talk) 03:20, 5 December 2009 (UTC)
Support, again, without hesitation. Jude (talk) 01:51, 5 December 2009 (UTC)
Support, what he ^^^ said billinghurst (talk) 04:04, 5 December 2009 (UTC)
Support, no worries. Cirt (talk) 07:58, 5 December 2009 (UTC)
Support --Zyephyrus (talk) 22:23, 5 December 2009 (UTC)
Support --John Vandenberg ^(chat) 22:42, 5 December 2009 (UTC)
Support--Prosfilaes (talk) 04:06, 6 December 2009 (UTC)
Support --Mattwj2002 (talk) 08:27, 8 December 2009 (UTC)
Support Yann (talk) 10:16, 8 December 2009 (UTC)
Support —Anonymous Dissident^Talk 14:26, 8 December 2009 (UTC)
Support. Tarmstro99 (talk) 18:36, 10 December 2009 (UTC)

—Confirmed billinghurst (talk) 06:08, 8 January 2010 (UTC)

2011-01 confirmation

The following discussion is closed:

confirmed

Administrator since 18 September 2005 (see previous discussions), currently active (contributions · logs · count · crossactivity). Jusjih will be reconfirmed automatically unless at least three established users oppose, which will trigger a vote of confidence with decision by simple majority.

Support. -- George Orwell III (talk) 20:55, 2 January 2011 (UTC)
Support. — billinghurst sDrewth 22:58, 2 January 2011 (UTC)
Support Hesperian 00:42, 3 January 2011 (UTC)
Support. --Eliyak T·C 01:17, 3 January 2011 (UTC)
Support. --Zyephyrus (talk) 15:53, 3 January 2011 (UTC)
Support. Jude (talk) 00:47, 4 January 2011 (UTC)
Support -- Maximillion Pegasus (talk) 17:16, 4 January 2011 (UTC)
Support --Mattwj2002 (talk) 04:56, 8 January 2011 (UTC)
Support --Inductiveload—talk/contribs 05:34, 9 January 2011 (UTC)
Support. Jafeluv (talk) 17:44, 9 January 2011 (UTC)
Support John Vandenberg ^(chat) 09:50, 10 January 2011 (UTC)

2012-02 confirmation

admin since September 2005 (see previous discussions), currently active (contributions · logs · count · crossactivity). Jusjih will be reconfirmed automatically unless at least three established users oppose, which will trigger a vote of confidence with decision by simple majority.

Support — billinghurst sDrewth 11:30, 3 February 2012 (UTC)
Support --Zyephyrus (talk) 13:55, 3 February 2012 (UTC)
Support — George Orwell III (talk) 18:57, 3 February 2012 (UTC)
Support --Mattwj2002 (talk) 22:11, 5 February 2012 (UTC)
Support - AdamBMorgan (talk) 10:52, 6 February 2012 (UTC)
Support — Ineuw talk 16:56, 6 February 2012 (UTC)
Support - Beeswaxcandle (talk) 08:42, 17 February 2012 (UTC)
Support - John Vandenberg ^(chat) 08:49, 17 February 2012 (UTC)
Support -- Cirt (talk) 09:14, 17 February 2012 (UTC)
Support — ResScholar (talk) 23:35, 19 February 2012 (UTC)
Support --Mpaa (talk) 15:01, 29 February 2012 (UTC)

2013-03 confirmation

admin since September 2005 (see previous discussions), currently active (contributions · logs · count · crossactivity). Jusjih will be reconfirmed automatically unless at least three established users oppose, which will trigger a vote of confidence with decision by simple majority.

support gone quieter — billinghurst sDrewth 14:10, 1 March 2013 (UTC)
support --Zyephyrus (talk) 08:49, 2 March 2013 (UTC)
Support EVula // talk // ☯ // 01:20, 20 March 2013 (UTC)
Support - AdamBMorgan (talk) 21:17, 25 March 2013 (UTC)
Support - —Maury (talk) 22:42, 25 March 2013 (UTC)
Support - ResScholar (talk) 05:48, 27 March 2013 (UTC)

2014-04 confirmation

admin since September 2005 (see previous discussions), currently active (contributions · logs · count · crossactivity). Jusjih will be reconfirmed automatically unless at least three established users oppose, which will trigger a vote of confidence with decision by simple majority.

Support —Clockery Fairfeld ^[t] 05:58, 1 April 2014 (UTC)
Support -- Zyephyrus (talk) 10:00, 1 April 2014 (UTC)
Support — Ineuw talk 02:37, 6 April 2014 (UTC)
Support —Maury (talk) 03:20, 6 April 2014 (UTC)
Support — George Orwell III (talk) 20:43, 18 April 2014 (UTC)
Y — billinghurst sDrewth 09:47, 20 April 2014 (UTC)
Support AuFCL (talk) 22:17, 21 April 2014 (UTC)
Support — ResScholar (talk) 08:18, 23 April 2014 (UTC)
Support Prosody (talk) 02:20, 28 April 2014 (UTC)
Support - AdamBMorgan (talk) 13:55, 29 April 2014 (UTC)

2015-05 confirmation

admin since September 2005 (see previous discussions), currently active (contributions · logs · count · crossactivity). Jusjih will be reconfirmed automatically unless at least three established users oppose, which will trigger a vote of confidence with decision by simple majority.

Support — Zyephyrus (talk) 22:44, 2 May 2015 (UTC)
Support --EncycloPetey (talk) 23:33, 2 May 2015 (UTC)
support — billinghurst sDrewth 10:42, 3 May 2015 (UTC)
Support — Ineuw talk 23:03, 12 May 2015 (UTC)
Support — George Orwell III (talk) 21:23, 16 May 2015 (UTC)
Support —Clockery_Fairfeld 20:35, 20 May 2015 (UTC)

2016-06 confirmation

admin since September 2005 (see previous discussions), currently active (contributions · logs · count · crossactivity). Jusjih will be reconfirmed automatically unless at least three established users oppose, which will trigger a vote of confidence with decision by simple majority.

Keep --Zyephyrus (talk) 14:33, 1 June 2016 (UTC)
Keep — billinghurst sDrewth 09:34, 4 June 2016 (UTC)
Oppose I have lost confidence in this admin, because he no longer meets any of the five Nomination standards. In particular, he seems very out of touch with the community. --EncycloPetey (talk) 02:47, 5 June 2016 (UTC)
Sorry, I have been very busy with matters outside wiki with reduced time checking here. Please assure that I do remember here, like checking the copyright discussions with many complex backlogs. Thanks for continuously supporting me with some unique East Asian cultural links.--Jusjih (talk) 23:50, 11 June 2016 (UTC)
Comment Admin rights simply give admin tools, which Jusjih has been using without criticism from the community. If we are going to start modifying our expectations of administrators for the retention of tools, then we should be looking to update WS:Adminship through community discussion. I also think that for a positive aspect to confirmations, especially where wish to recommend de-adminship, that we could be looking to express what is desired to remedy expressed shortcomings.
enWS community (historically) has expressed a desire for a simple hierarchical rights model ("basic" > "patrolled" -> "admin"), and we rejected intermediate rights configurations (see rollbackers discussion in 2010 [1]). I think that the statement that encapsulated the 2010 position re adminship and rights is …

“	[enWS is] liberal with Admin privileges which helps foster community, prevent cabals and hierarchies, etc. Introducing a medium-grade rank could undo that, and because of our unique raison d'etre, vandalism is a very small problem...as is admin abuse.	”
—Sherurcij

As such we either trust people and give them tools to use, or we change our trust model that adminship is more than tools, it is about leading and continuing to lead. I actually still see them as separate. — billinghurst sDrewth 03:27, 22 June 2016 (UTC)

You might want to reread the criteria as stated at WS:Adminship. It does not need to be updated because the criteria invoked in this discussion are already there. --EncycloPetey (talk) 03:35, 22 June 2016 (UTC)

To me, you are conflating "nominating standards" ('at the time' expectations) with "obligations of administrators" (ongoing expectations). My commentary was to more generally address some of our more recent comments in discussions on this page that seem to be raised that sit outside the ability to utilise tools within community expectations. — billinghurst sDrewth 05:18, 22 June 2016 (UTC)

It seems you didn't read the whole page. Look at "Loss of adminship" at the bottom. One of the reasons for loss of adminship is that the community loses confidence in them. Nothing you have said thus far changes that opinion, nor addresses the fact that it is explicitly given as a reason for loss of adminship.

In any event, if a person was put forward as an admin on the basis that they met certain criteria, but no longer meet those criteria for nomination at a later date, I fail to see how that would be anything but a problem. Or do you mean that we selecting people to do a job on the basis of criteria that have nothing to do with the job? --EncycloPetey (talk) 06:01, 22 June 2016 (UTC)

I am not having a specific opinion on your reasons, I am just saying that adminship states the obligations, and if we are saying that the obligations are changed/judged differently by the community then we should have a discussion to change the criteria. In my experience the deadminship for loss of confidence has been for actions taken in contravention of their obligations. PS. Trust me, I read the whole page, know its words and its intent around the time of its drafting; and the commentary here more recently is a change to the past. — billinghurst sDrewth 10:18, 22 June 2016 (UTC)

<--
I think for most people the nominating standards for admins are included in the ongoing expectations. Using the tools wisely is an additional expectation that naturally didn't exist when the admins didn't have access to the admin tools. Removing inactive admins for "inactivity" isn't a commentary on their trustworthiness, it's a commentary on their level of participation here. Retaining inactive users as admins makes no sense to me -- it suggests that Wikisource has 30+ highly dedicated, experienced, and active volunteers here and now. That's misleading to more casual and inexperienced volunteers. I think we should avoid misleading casual and inexperienced volunteers. Outlier59 (talk) 01:32, 23 June 2016 (UTC)

Billinghurst and Outlier59 each have good points: community trust is a requirement for sysop nomination; but both leadership and maintained trust (of either procedural or technical aspect—ideally both) is required for continuance of higher authority.

With regards Jusjih I see no reason for changing my existing vote below. AuFCL (talk) 03:33, 25 June 2016 (UTC)

Support—AuFCL (talk) 00:06, 12 June 2016 (UTC)
Oppose I agree with EncycloPetey. While I appreciate this admin's contributions to copyright discussions, I think admins need to be actively involved more broadly with maintaining and improving this English Wikisource to be an admin here. Jusjih can obviously be trusted with the tools, but the admin role, as EncycloPetey noted, also includes being widely active HERE in English Wikisource. Outlier59 (talk) 01:05, 12 June 2016 (UTC)
Keep --Yann (talk) 14:00, 21 June 2016 (UTC)
Keep Jusjih does an excellent job with some tasks that no one else seems to do (particularly with proposed deletions) and I hope they continue to do so. —Beleg Tâl (talk) 00:27, 22 June 2016 (UTC)
Support--Prosfilaes (talk) 04:27, 22 June 2016 (UTC)
Support — Ineuw talk 15:54, 22 June 2016 (UTC)
Keep —Spangineer (háblame) 12:18, 5 July 2016 (UTC)

2017-07 confirmation

admin since September 2005 (see previous discussions), currently active (contributions · logs · count · crossactivity). Jusjih will be reconfirmed automatically unless at least three established users oppose, which will trigger a vote of confidence with decision by simple majority.

Keep — Ineuw talk 15:45, 4 July 2017 (UTC)
Keep — Zyephyrus (talk) 17:11, 4 July 2017 (UTC)
Keep—Beleg Tâl (talk) 19:08, 4 July 2017 (UTC)
Keep - does the job well. BD2412 T 01:38, 5 July 2017 (UTC)

2018-08 confirmation

admin since September 2005 (see previous discussions), currently active (contributions · logs · count · crossactivity). Jusjih will be reconfirmed automatically unless at least three established users oppose, which will trigger a vote of confidence with decision by simple majority.

Support -- BethNaught (talk) 07:46, 1 August 2018 (UTC)
Support -- Zyephyrus (talk) 09:00, 1 August 2018 (UTC)
Support --EncycloPetey (talk) 16:22, 1 August 2018 (UTC)
Support -- I believe that we have had some differences in the past, but I see no reason for Jusjih not to continue wielding the mop. BD2412 T 22:36, 1 August 2018 (UTC)
Support — billinghurst sDrewth 11:04, 2 August 2018 (UTC)
Support — Ineuw talk 02:38, 6 August 2018 (UTC)

2019-09 confirmation

admin since September 2005 (see previous discussions), currently active (contributions · logs · count · crossactivity). Jusjih will be reconfirmed automatically unless at least three established users oppose, which will trigger a vote of confidence with decision by simple majority.

Support –MJL ‐Talk‐^☖ 01:10, 2 September 2019 (UTC)
Support — Hrishikes (talk) 01:15, 2 September 2019 (UTC)
Support --Xover (talk) 06:29, 2 September 2019 (UTC)
Support --Zyephyrus (talk) 08:18, 2 September 2019 (UTC)
Support --Prosfilaes (talk) 17:26, 2 September 2019 (UTC)
Support — Ineuw (talk) 20:09, 3 September 2019 (UTC)
Support BD2412 T 01:09, 4 September 2019 (UTC)
Support Ankry (talk) 10:29, 4 September 2019 (UTC)
Support I agree that he should still be granted with special powers. He is a trusted user and is granted steward on many Wikimedia projects. --Josephina Phoebe White (talk) 23:31, 11 September 2019 (UTC)
Thanks. I am an administrator on 13 wikis, not a steward anymore.--Jusjih (talk) 13:41, 16 September 2019 (UTC)

2020-10 confirmation

admin since September 2005 (see previous discussions), currently active (contributions · logs · count · crossactivity). Jusjih will be reconfirmed automatically unless at least three established users oppose, which will trigger a vote of confidence with decision by simple majority.

Support --Xover (talk) 09:37, 1 October 2020 (UTC)
Support --Zyephyrus (talk) 15:46, 1 October 2020 (UTC)
Support --DannyS712 (talk) 15:55, 1 October 2020 (UTC)
Support BD2412 T 15:53, 2 October 2020 (UTC)

2021-11 confirmation

Admin since September 2005 (see previous discussions), currently active (contributions · logs · count · crossactivity). Jusjih will be reconfirmed automatically unless at least three established users oppose, which will trigger a vote of confidence with decision by simple majority.

Support--Zyephyrus (talk) 21:41, 1 November 2021 (UTC)
Support--Xover (talk) 16:03, 2 November 2021 (UTC)
Support --DannyS712 (talk) 04:58, 4 November 2021 (UTC)
Support --Jan Kameníček (talk) 07:35, 5 November 2021 (UTC)
Support — Hrishikes (talk) 07:38, 5 November 2021 (UTC)
Support — Ankry (talk) 12:59, 6 November 2021 (UTC)

2022-12 confirmation

admin since September 2005 (see previous discussions), currently active (contributions · logs · count · crossactivity). Jusjih will be reconfirmed automatically unless at least three established users oppose, which will trigger a vote of confidence with decision by simple majority.

Support — BD2412 T 17:07, 2 December 2022 (UTC)
Support PseudoSkull (talk) 17:59, 3 December 2022 (UTC)
Support --DannyS712 (talk) 23:03, 6 December 2022 (UTC)
-- Support -- Zyephyrus (talk) 23:07, 13 December 2022 (UTC)

2024-01 confirmation

admin since 2005-09 (see previous discussions), currently active (contributions · logs · count · crossactivity). Jusjih will be reconfirmed automatically unless at least three established users oppose, which will trigger a vote of confidence with decision by simple majority.

Support PseudoSkull (talk) 14:20, 5 January 2024 (UTC)
Support --Jan Kameníček (talk) 11:38, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
Support. --Zyephyrus (talk) 21:01, 7 January 2024 (UTC)
Support --DannyS712 (talk) 22:21, 17 January 2024 (UTC)